期刊文献+

西酞普兰治疗晚发抑郁障碍疗效和安全性的Meta分析 被引量:3

Meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of citalopram in treatment of late-onset depression disorder
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价西酞普兰治疗晚发抑郁障碍的疗效和安全性。方法按照系统评价的要求检索PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊全文数据库,以Jadad法对纳入文献进行质量评价,应用Stata 11.0和Revman 5.0软件对西酞普兰治疗晚发抑郁障碍的临床研究文献进行Meta分析。结果共检索出531篇文献,符合标准的16篇进入Meta分析。西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药物治疗晚发抑郁障碍的总痊愈率、总有效率及HAMD量表总分比较,均无显著差异(P>0.05),总不良事件发生率比较有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药物治疗晚发抑郁障碍的疗效相当,安全性好,适合老年患者使用。 AIM To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of citalopram in the treatment of late- onset depression disorder. METHODS The studies on efficacy and safety of citalopram in treatment of late-onset depression disorder were searched in PubMed, CBM and CNKI from 1998 to 2012 in Chinese and English. The quality of included trails was evaluated by Jadad scale. A Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 and Revman 5.0 for the included studies. RESULTS Totally 531 trails were found and sixteen studies were included in the Meta-analysis. The total recovery rate, the total effective rate and the total HAMD scores of citalopram on late-onset depression disorder showed non-significant differences compared with other anti-depression medicines (P 〉 0.05). The total incidence of adverse events was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION Citalopram and other antidepressants have equivalent efficacy on late-onset depression disorder with less adverse events, and is suitable for elderly patients.
作者 李建峰 杨洁
出处 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期492-498,共7页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词 抑郁症 西酞普兰 META分析 depressive disorder citalopram Meta- analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1van den BERG MD, OLDEHINKEL AJ, BOUHUYS AL, et al. Depression in later life, three etiologically different subgroups[J]. J Affect Disord, 2001, 65(1): 19-26.
  • 2康德英,洪旗,刘关键,王家良.Meta分析中发表性偏倚的识别与处理[J].中国循证医学杂志,2003,3(1):45-49. 被引量:197
  • 3KYLE C J, PETERSEN HEH, OVERO KF. Comparison of the tolerability andefficaey of citalopram and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients treated in general practice [J]. Depress Anxiety, 1998, 8(4): 147-153.
  • 4KARLSSON I, GODDERIS J, AUGUSTO DE MENDONA LIMA C, et al. A randomised double- blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of citalopram compared to mianserin in elderly, depressed patients with or without mild to moderate dementia[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2000, 15(4) : 295-305.
  • 5NAVARRO V, GASTO C, TORRES X, et al. Citalopram versus nortriptyline in late- life depression: a 12- week randomized single- blind study[J]. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2001, 103 (6): 435-440.
  • 6ALLARD P, GRAM L, TIMDAHL K, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in geriatric outpatients with major depression : a double - blind, randomised 6 - month comparative trial with eitalopram[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2004, 19(12): 1123-1130.
  • 7RAMPELLO L, CHIECHIO S, NICOLETFI G, et al Prediction of the response to citalopram and reboxetine in post- stroke depressed patients[J]. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2004, 173 (1-2) : 73-78.
  • 8景艳玲,王立钢,张桂敏.西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁症对照研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2005,5(6):459-460. 被引量:4
  • 9郭自相.西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁症的对照研究[J].中国民康医学,2005,17(12):758-758. 被引量:1
  • 10黄继伟,孙正明.西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗首发老年抑郁症对照研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2006,12(3):175-176. 被引量:8

二级参考文献37

共引文献210

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部