期刊文献+

利用TWP-ICE试验资料对比两种边界层参数化方案 被引量:6

Contrastive Study on Two Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes Using TWP-ICE Experiment Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用高分辨率WRF单气柱模式,选取了两种边界层参数化方案(YSU,MYJ),对TWP-ICE(Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment)试验期间的个例进行数值模拟,比较了两种方案对边界层结构、云和降水模拟的影响。结果表明:季风活跃期,YSU方案模拟的湍流交换系数较小,湍流混合偏弱,边界层内热通量偏小,使地表热量和水汽不易向上输送,水汽含量在近地表明显偏多,而在边界层及其以上大气层具有显著的干偏差,因此该方案模拟的云中液态水和固态水含量偏低,云量偏少,降水率偏小;MYJ方案对于季风活跃期的边界层结构具有较好的模拟能力,其模拟的云和降水更为准确。季风抑制期,MYJ方案模拟的夜间边界层结构存在较大误差,这是因为该方案模拟的夜间湍流交换系数较大,湍流混合偏强,边界层内热通量偏大,模拟的位温和水汽混合比在边界层内随高度变化较小,而观测廓线在边界层内存在较大梯度。季风抑制期两种方案模拟的云和降水均比观测值偏多,方案之间的差异较小。 TWP-ICE (Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment)is carried out at Darwin Station in northern Australia by Europe and the United States,observations can be used for numerical simulation study.High resolution WRF single column model is used to simulate a case during TWP-ICE with two boundary layer parameterization schemes (YSU and MYJ schemes).Simulation results of boundary layer structure,cloud and precipitation with these two boundary layer parameterization schemes are compared. The whole simulation process can be divided into two phases,which are monsoon active period and monsoon suppressed period.During monsoon active period,the boundary layer structure simulated by MYJ scheme is better than YSU scheme.Small turbulent exchange coefficient is simulated by YSU scheme leading to weak turbulent mixing and small heat flux in boundary layer during monsoon active period, which prevents the heat and moisture of surface from upward transporting.Therefore,the simulated po-tential temperature and vapor mixing ratio are significantly higher than observations at the bottom bounda-ry layer,and the simulated vapor mixing ratio is lower than observation at the top of boundary layer.Dur-ing monsoon suppressed period,great turbulent exchange coefficient is simulated by MYJ scheme at night, leading to strong turbulent mixing and large heat flux,and the simulated potential temperature and vapor mixing ratio variation with height are smaller than observations,so MYJ scheme cannot simulate the struc-ture of nocturnal boundary layer well. Also,the simulation of cloud and precipitation is affected by the boundary layer parameterization schemes.During monsoon active period,weak turbulent mixing is simulated by YSU scheme,leading to the wet bias near the surface and dry bias above.As a result,YSU scheme simulates smaller cloud liquid water content and frozen water content,less cloud fraction and lower precipitation rate.During the same period,MYJ scheme simulates the boundary layer structure well,and can better simulate cloud and precip-itation.During monsoon suppressed period,the cloud fraction and precipitation simulated with both schemes show no significant difference,both exceeding observations.
出处 《应用气象学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期385-396,共12页 Journal of Applied Meteorological Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(2013CB430103 2011CB403405) 国家自然科学基金项目(41375058 41175065) 江苏高等学校优秀科技创新团队计划项目(PIT2012)
关键词 单气柱模式 边界层参数化 TWP-ICE试验 湍流混合 single column model boundary layer parameterization TWP-ICE experiment turbulent mixing
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1顾建峰,殷鹤宝,徐一鸣,蒋贤安,梁旭东.MM5在上海区域气象中心数值预报中的改进和应用[J].应用气象学报,2000,11(2):189-198. 被引量:19
  • 2Xie B,Fung J C H,Chan A,et al.Evaluation of nonlocal and local planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model.J Geophys Res,2012,117:D12103.
  • 3Xie B,Hunt J C R,Carruthers D J,et al.Structure of the planetary boundary layer over Southeast England:Modeling and measurements.J Geophys Res,2013,118:7799-7818.
  • 4Cintineo R,Otkin J,Xue M,et al.Evaluating the performance of planetary boundary layer and cloud microphysical parame-terization schemes in convection-permitting ensemble fore-casts using synthetic GOES-13 satellite observations.Mon Wea Rev,2014,142:163-182.
  • 5陈炯,王建捷.北京地区夏季边界层结构日变化的高分辨模拟对比[J].应用气象学报,2006,17(4):403-411. 被引量:53
  • 6刘梦娟,陈敏.BJ-RUC系统对北京夏季边界层的预报性能评估[J].应用气象学报,2014,25(2):212-221. 被引量:14
  • 7Hong S,Pan H.Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model.Mort Wea Rev,1996,124:2322-2339.
  • 8Jankov I,Gallus W A,Segal M,et al.The impact of different WRF model physical parameterizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall.Wea Forecasting,2005,20 1048-1060.
  • 9Jankov I,Schultz P J,Anderson C J,et al.The impact of dif-ferent physical parameterizations and their interactions on cold season QPF in the American River Basin.J Hydromete-or,2007,8:1141-1151.
  • 10王晨稀,端义宏.短期集合预报技术在梅雨降水预报中的试验研究[J].应用气象学报,2003,14(1):69-78. 被引量:59

二级参考文献94

共引文献226

同被引文献94

引证文献6

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部