期刊文献+

Novel completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in de novo lesions: nine-month angiographic and three-year clinical outcomes of HOPE trial 被引量:2

Novel completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in de novo lesions: nine-month angiographic and three-year clinical outcomes of HOPE trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Drug-eluting stents(DES) with durable polymer have significantly reduced restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared with bare metal stents. Durable polymer has been linked with persistent inflammation of vessel wall and delayed endothelial healing that may increase the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HELLOS completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in de novo coronary lesions.Methods Totally, 287 patients with one or two de novo coronary lesions (lesion length ≤38 mm and reference vessel diameter 2.5-4.0 mm) were enrolled in the HOPE study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to treatment either with HELIOS completed biodegradable polymer SES (n=142) or PARTNER durable polymer SES (n=145). The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint included stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR).Results The 9-month in-stent LLL in the HELIOS group was similar to the PARTNER group, (0.16±0.22) mm vs. (0.19±0.30) mm (P=0.28). The difference and 95% confidence interval were -0.03 (-0.09, 0.04), and the P value for non-inferiority 〈0.01. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurred in 7.9% vs. 8.2%, MI in 2.4% vs. 3.0%, TLR in 5.5% vs. 3.0%, and stent thrombosis in 0 vs. 1.5%; and events were comparable between the HELIOS group and PARTNER aroup at three-year follow-up (all P 〉0.05). The three-year cardiac death was lower in the HELIOS group, butwith no significant difference, 0 vs. 3.0% (P=0.12). Conclusions In the HOPE trial, the novel completed biodegradable polymer SES HELIOS was non-inferior to the durable polymer SES PARTNER with respect to nine-month in-stent LLL in de novo coronary lesions. The incidence of other clinical endpoints was low for both of the stents in three-year follow-up. Background Drug-eluting stents(DES) with durable polymer have significantly reduced restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared with bare metal stents. Durable polymer has been linked with persistent inflammation of vessel wall and delayed endothelial healing that may increase the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HELLOS completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in de novo coronary lesions.Methods Totally, 287 patients with one or two de novo coronary lesions (lesion length ≤38 mm and reference vessel diameter 2.5-4.0 mm) were enrolled in the HOPE study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to treatment either with HELIOS completed biodegradable polymer SES (n=142) or PARTNER durable polymer SES (n=145). The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint included stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR).Results The 9-month in-stent LLL in the HELIOS group was similar to the PARTNER group, (0.16±0.22) mm vs. (0.19±0.30) mm (P=0.28). The difference and 95% confidence interval were -0.03 (-0.09, 0.04), and the P value for non-inferiority 〈0.01. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurred in 7.9% vs. 8.2%, MI in 2.4% vs. 3.0%, TLR in 5.5% vs. 3.0%, and stent thrombosis in 0 vs. 1.5%; and events were comparable between the HELIOS group and PARTNER aroup at three-year follow-up (all P 〉0.05). The three-year cardiac death was lower in the HELIOS group, butwith no significant difference, 0 vs. 3.0% (P=0.12). Conclusions In the HOPE trial, the novel completed biodegradable polymer SES HELIOS was non-inferior to the durable polymer SES PARTNER with respect to nine-month in-stent LLL in de novo coronary lesions. The incidence of other clinical endpoints was low for both of the stents in three-year follow-up.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第14期2561-2566,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 biodegradable polymer titanium oxides films drug-eluting stents biodegradable polymer titanium oxides films drug-eluting stents
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 370: 937-948.
  • 2Marzocchi A, Saia F, Piovaccari G, Manari A, Aurier E, Benassi A, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents: two-year results of the REAL Multicenter Registry. Circulation 2007; 115: 3181-3188.
  • 3Garg E Normand SL, Silbaugh TS, Wolf RE, Zelevinsky K, Lovett A, et al. Drug-eluting of bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts data analysis center registry. Circulation 2008; 118: 2277-2285.
  • 4Mauri L, Silbaugh TS, Wolf RE, Zelevinsky K, Lovett A, Zhou Z, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting and bare-metal stenting in Massachusetts. Circulation 2008; 118: 1817-1827.
  • 5Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HE Buser PT, Rickenbacher R Hunziker R Mueller C, et al. Late clinical events after clorpidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2584-2591.
  • 6Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation 2007; 115: 1440-1455.
  • 7Nebeker JR, Virmani R, Bennett CL, Hoffman JM, Samore MH, Alvarez J, et al. Hypersensitivity cases associated with drug-eluting coronary stents: a review of available cases from the Research on Advrse Durag Events and Reports (RADAR) proiect. J Am Coil Cardiol 2006; 47:175-181.
  • 8Guagliumi G~ Farb A, Musumci G, Valsecchi O, Tespili M, Motta T, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implanted in human coronary artery for 16 months: pathological findings. Circulation 2003; 107: 1340-1341.
  • 9Fere F, Costa JR, Abizaid A. Very late thrombosis after drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 83-88.
  • 10Grube E, Sonoda S, Ikeno F, Honda Y, Kar S, Chan C, et al. Six- and twelve-month results from first human experience using everolimus-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymer. Circulation 2004; 109: 2168-2171.

共引文献5

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部