期刊文献+

Impact of microbubble enhanced, pulsed, focused ultrasound on tumor circulation of subcutaneous VX2 cancer 被引量:6

Impact of microbubble enhanced, pulsed, focused ultrasound on tumor circulation of subcutaneous VX2 cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Intravascular microbubble-enhanced acoustic cavitation is capable of disrupting the vascular walls of capillaries and small vessels. This study was designed to investigate the impact of microbubble-enhanced, pulsed and focused ultrasound (MEUS) on the blood perfusion of subcutaneous VX2 tumors in rabbits. Methods Subcutaneous VX2 cancers in twenty New Zealand rabbits were treated by combining high-pressure amplitude, pulsed and focused therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) and intravenous microbubble injections. The TUS transducer was operated with a peak negative pressure of 4.6 MPa and a duty cycle of 0.41%. Controls were subcutaneous VX2 cancers treated with TUS or microbubbles only. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and intravenous Evans Blue (EB) perfusion were performed to assess the tumor circulation. The tumor microvascular disruption was assessed by histological examination. Results CEUS showed that the tumor circulation almost vanished after MEUS treatment. The average peak grayscale value (GSV) of tumor CEUS dropped significantly from 84.1±22.4 to 15.8±10.8 in the MEUS-treated tumors but no significant GSV changes were found in tumors in the two control groups. The mean tumor EB content of the MEUS-treated tumors was significantly lower than that of the controls. Histological examination found scattered tumor microvascular disruption with intercellular edema after MEUS treatment. Conclusion The tumor circulation of VX2 cancers can be arrested or significantly reduced by MEUS due to microvascular disruption. Chin M~.cl ,I 2014:127 (14): 2605-2611 Background Intravascular microbubble-enhanced acoustic cavitation is capable of disrupting the vascular walls of capillaries and small vessels. This study was designed to investigate the impact of microbubble-enhanced, pulsed and focused ultrasound (MEUS) on the blood perfusion of subcutaneous VX2 tumors in rabbits. Methods Subcutaneous VX2 cancers in twenty New Zealand rabbits were treated by combining high-pressure amplitude, pulsed and focused therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) and intravenous microbubble injections. The TUS transducer was operated with a peak negative pressure of 4.6 MPa and a duty cycle of 0.41%. Controls were subcutaneous VX2 cancers treated with TUS or microbubbles only. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and intravenous Evans Blue (EB) perfusion were performed to assess the tumor circulation. The tumor microvascular disruption was assessed by histological examination. Results CEUS showed that the tumor circulation almost vanished after MEUS treatment. The average peak grayscale value (GSV) of tumor CEUS dropped significantly from 84.1±22.4 to 15.8±10.8 in the MEUS-treated tumors but no significant GSV changes were found in tumors in the two control groups. The mean tumor EB content of the MEUS-treated tumors was significantly lower than that of the controls. Histological examination found scattered tumor microvascular disruption with intercellular edema after MEUS treatment. Conclusion The tumor circulation of VX2 cancers can be arrested or significantly reduced by MEUS due to microvascular disruption. Chin M~.cl ,I 2014:127 (14): 2605-2611
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第14期2605-2611,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 VX2 tumor CIRCULATION therapeutic ultrasound MICROBUBBLE contrast-enhanced ultrasound VX2 tumor circulation therapeutic ultrasound microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2039- 2049.
  • 2Folkman J. Angiogenesis and apoptosis. Semin in Cancer Biol 2003; 13: 159-167.
  • 3Ribatti D, Nico B, Crivellato E, Vacca A. The structure of the vascular network oftttmors. Cancer Lett 2007; 248: 18-23.
  • 4Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: Targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res 2007; 74: 72-84.
  • 5Makrilia N, Lappa T, Xyla V, Nikolaidis I, Syrigos K. The role of angiogenesis in solid tumours: An overview. Eur J of Intern Med 2009; 20: 663-671.
  • 6Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. Eur J Radio12006; 60: 324-330.
  • 7Prentice P, Cuschieri A, Dholakia K, Prausnitz M, Campbell P. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat Phys 2005; 1: 107-110.
  • 8Brujan EA. Cardiovascular cavitation. Med Eng Phys 2009; 31: 742-751.
  • 9Shi WT, Forsberg F, Tomes A, Ostensen J, Goldberg BB. Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. Ultrasound Med Bio12000; 26: 1009-1019.
  • 10Tu J, Hwang JH, Matula T J, Brayman AA, Crum LA. Intravascular inertial cavitation activity detection and quantification in vivo with optison. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1601-1609.

同被引文献15

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部