期刊文献+

利奈唑胺治疗革兰阳性球菌重症感染的临床分析 被引量:13

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 分析及探讨利奈唑胺治疗革兰阳性球菌重症感染患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法 纳入潮州市潮安区庵埠华侨医院ICU革兰阳性球菌重症感染85例,设置前瞻观察性的随机对照试验,随机分为对照组(n=42)和实验组(n=43),纳入标准革兰氏阳性细菌重症感染患者。原发感染包括医院获得性肺炎、手术部位感染,导管相关性菌血症。实验组应用利奈唑胺600mg/次,间隔12h/次,静脉滴注,连续应用7~14 d。对照组应用万古霉素1g/次,间隔12h/次,治疗7~14d。对有肾功能异常者,根据内生肌酐清除率CCr调整给药剂量并监测血药浓度。观察临床疗效、不良反应及病原学监测情况。结果 利奈唑胺组总有效率为90.6%,万古霉素组总有效率为83.3%,2组比较无显著统计学差异。利奈唑胺治疗第7d的细菌清除率为81.3%,对照组为66.6%,2组比较差异具体统计学意义。利奈唑胺的总住院天数为(30.9±31.1)d,对照组为(45.2±34.9)d,2组比较差异无统计学意义。2组中均未见严重不良反应。结论 利奈唑胺治疗重症患者的革兰阳性球菌感染的疗效确切,特别是在疗效的第7d细菌根除率明显优于万古霉素,可能会缩短住院时间,减少相关住院费用,不良反应较少。
作者 杨晓东
出处 《当代医学》 2014年第24期137-138,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1卫林英,段兴民.Meta分析在科学研究中的应用与展望[J].生产力研究,2006(6):144-146. 被引量:10
  • 2Gosbell I B. Epidemiology, clinical features and management of infections due to community methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus(cMRSA)[J]. Int Med, 2005, 35(2): 120 - 135.
  • 3Stevens D L, Herr D, Lampiris H, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycinfor the treatment of methicillln-resistant Staphylococcus aureusinfections[J] . Clin Infect Dis, 2002, 34(1): 1481 - 1490.
  • 4Weigelt J, Kaafarani H M, Itani K M, et al. Linezolid eradicates MRSA better than vancomycin from surgical-site infections[J]. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(6): 760 -766.
  • 5Sharpe J N, Shively E H, Polk HC Jr. Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Am J Surg, 2005, 189(4): 425 -428.
  • 6Weigelt J, Itani K, Stevens D, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49 (6) : 2260 - 2266.
  • 7Rubinstein E, Cammarata S, Oliphant T, et al. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2001, 32 (1):402 -412.
  • 8Kollef M H, Rello J, Cammarata S K, et al. Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2004, 30(3): 388 - 394.
  • 9Wunderink R G, Cammarata S K, Oliphant T H, et al. Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, muhicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia[J]. Clin Ther, 2003, 25( 1 ): 980 - 992.
  • 10Wunderink R G, Rello J, Cammarata S K, et al. Linezolid vs vancomycin. Analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia[J]. Chest, 2003, 124(5): 1789 - 1797.

共引文献22

同被引文献72

  • 1周萍,张葵,张之烽.革兰阳性球菌对利奈唑胺等抗菌药物体外药敏分析[J].临床输血与检验,2011,13(2):142-144. 被引量:4
  • 2张丽,杨文航,肖盟,等.2010年度卫生部全国细菌耐药监测网报告:ICU来源细菌耐药性监测[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(1):34-38.
  • 3中华医学会儿科分会急救学组.第四届全国小儿急救医学研讨会纪要[J].中华儿科杂志,1995,33(6):370-373.
  • 4Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing [ S ]. Twenty - first informa- tional supplement ,2012, M100 - $22.
  • 5Faisy C, Candela L, Lerena M, et al. Early ICU energy deficit is a risk factor for Staphylococcus aureus ventilator - associated pneu- monia[J]. Chest, 2011, 140(5) : 1254 - 1260.
  • 6Schroeder K,Simank HU,Lorenz H,et al.Implant stability in the treatment of MRSA bone implant infections with linezolid versus vancomycin in a rabbit model[J].J Orthop Res,2012,30(2):190-195.
  • 7TUBAU F, FERNANDEZ-ROBLAS R. LINARES J, et al. In vitro activity of linezolid and 11 other antimicrobi- als against 566 clinical isolates and comparison between NCCLS microdiluticn and Etest methods [J].J Antimicrob Chemcthcr, 2001,48(4):675-680.
  • 8Diekema D J, Jones RN. Oxazolidinone antibiotics[J].Lan- cet, 2001, 358(9297): 1975-1982.
  • 9Bishop E, Melvani S, Howden BP, et al. Good clinical outcomes but high rates of adverse ructions during line- zolid therapy for serious infections: a proposed protocol for monitoring therapy in complex patients[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2006, 50(4): 1599-1602.
  • 10潘国权,杜立中.利奈唑胺治疗儿童重症革兰阳性球菌感染26例[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2009,28(5):392-395. 被引量:7

引证文献13

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部