期刊文献+

基于360度模式的药品安全监管能力评价问卷设计 被引量:2

Questionnaire Designing of Evaluation on Drug Safety Supervision Capacities Based upon a 360 Degree Performance Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的药品安全监管属于药品管理部门公共服务的一个部分。药品安全监管能力评价是在政府绩效理论指导下实施的针对性评价工作。本文探讨系统评价药品安全监管工作能力的模式,以形成一套科学、有效的评价办法,从而达到客观评价药品安全监管工作成效的目的。方法基于360度模式设计药品安全监管能力调查问卷,从上级、同级、下级、专家以及社会公众等多角度开展,共设计6个评价主体、8份调查问卷,并以北京市药品安全监管情况调查为例进行了评价。结果通过检验问卷的信度和效度,信度分析显示Cronbach′α系数大于0.75,具有可接受的一致性;效度经KMO及Bartlett′s检验,KMO值为0.596,具有良好的结构效度。结论360度评价模式能够从不同的角度全面反映受评者的业绩,较单一来源的评价方式更为公正、真实、客观、准确、可信。 Objective Drug safety supervision is part of public services of drug administration. Evaluation on drug safety supervision capacities is performed under the guidance of government performance measurement theory. In this paper we discuss the mode of evaluation on the ability of drug safety supervision in Beijing, in order to establish scientific and effective evaluation methods. Methods In this study, we designed questionnaires for evaluation of drug safety supervision capacities based on a 360 degree performance model, involving superiors, peers, subordinates, experts and the public. We designed six evaluation subjects and eight questionnaires, and evaluated the investigations conducted in Beijing. Results Reliability and validity were tested for these questionnaires. The results showed that reliability was consistent (Cronbachr'a〉 0.75) and validity was good (KMO〉 0. 596) by KMO and Bartlett's test. Conclusion Compared to single-sourced evaluation, the questionnaires for evaluation on drug safety supervision capacities based on a 360 degree performance model are more reasonable, practical, objective, accurate and reliable, which can comprehensively reflect performance of ratees.
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2014年第7期700-705,共6页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
基金 北京中医药大学创新团队发展计划资助项目(编号2011-CXTD-13)
关键词 问卷设计 药品安全监管 360度模式 工作能力评价 questionnaire designing drug safety supervision 360 degree model evaluation on workcapacities
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1郑方辉,吴轶.地方政府绩效评价中的公众满意度调查[J].市场研究,2007(3):25-29. 被引量:26
  • 2Bailey K D. Methods of Social Research (4th edition)[M]. New York:The Free Press,1994.115-165.
  • 3Bartko J J.The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability[J]. Psychol Rep,1996,(19):3-6.
  • 4曹林.行政化无孔不入导致第三方严重稀缺[N].中国青年报,2007-06-12.
  • 5[美]罗伯特·P·沃森.公共行政:管理中的角色模拟与案例分析[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003.188.
  • 6《周瑞金谈第三次思想大解放》,《南方日报》2008年3月17日.
  • 7关信平.社会研究方法[M]高等教育出版社,2004.
  • 8Bouckaert,Geert.Measurement and meaningful management[].Public Productivity and Management Review.1993
  • 9刘朝杰.问卷的信度与效度评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1997,5(4):174-177. 被引量:214
  • 10朱立言.从绩效评估走向绩效管理——美国经验和中国实践[J].行政论坛,2008,15(2):37-41. 被引量:21

共引文献858

同被引文献41

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部