宽严相济刑事政策与刑法解释学

The Criminal Policy of Temper Justice with Mercy and the Criminal Law interpretation

刑法解释学的蓬勃发展使得刑法学生机盎然,实质解释与形式解释两种解释理念的对抗让"正义"再次展现出多元化,是打击犯罪还是保障人权,这是个价值选择问题。刑事政策为刑法解释学的走向指明了方向。当前的宽严相济的基本刑事政策表明,"宽大"与"严格"的刑事政策指导了刑法解释学的基本走向——以严格解释为基础,以扩张解释为补充。针对妨害秩序的犯罪应当严格解释,针对公民人身、民主权利和财产权的犯罪可以扩张解释。同时,尊重行为类型在刑法中的基础地位,限制想象竞合的滥用。

The booming criminal law interpretation accelerates criminal law; furthermore,＂justice＂is showing diversification because of contradiction between the substantial interpretation and the formal interpretation. That whether fighting against crime or protecting human rights is a value choice. The criminal policy gives the criminal interpretation a clear direction. The present criminal policy of temper justice with mercy shows that criminal policy of ＂leniency＇and ＂strictness＂deterrnines the trend of the criminal law interpretation--being based on the strict interpretation and complemented with the amplified interpretation. For the crimes of offence against public order, strict interpretation should be applied; while for the crimes of infringement upon the personal rights, democratic fight and the property the amplified interpretation. The fundamental status of behavior pattern in criminal law is worth to be respected; abuse of imaginative ioinder should be limited.