期刊文献+

专业志愿选择影响职业决策的统计模型分析 被引量:6

Majors Selection and Career Decision-Making:A Statistical Model Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 填报高考专业志愿的过程是青年人对未来职业生涯发展规划做出非常重要的职业决策的过程。本研究建构了影响专业志愿满意度的专业决策蛛网统计分析模型,找出专业选择影响职业决策趋于稳定的条件。研究结果显示,专业志愿的选择因素通过专业学习满意度的中介作用对大学生职业决策的稳定性产生显著影响。通过降低志愿填报者对专业志愿需求的敏感程度和优化专业教育资源意识两种干预策略,可以达成借助专业选择满意度的中介作用提升大学生职业决策稳定性的职业生涯辅导目标。 Abstract: The process of senior high school graduates selecting majors which they will learn in a university, is the very important career decision-making process made by the youngers for their future career planning. This paper configured a cobweb statistical analysis model, which was about making majors selection, to probe in the stability conditions of career decision-making influenced by satisfaction of majors choice. The result showed that some influencing factors of majors selection have significant impact on career decision-making stability through the intermediary role of majors learning satisfaction. There were two intervention strategies used to reach the career counseling goal of promoting the stability of career decision-making, with the intermediary role of majors choice satisfaction. One strategy was to reduce demand sensitivity on major willingness, another to optimize the awareness of education resource for majors learning.
出处 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期171-176,共6页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划资助项目:大学生职业决策困难判别与干预的实证研究(GD11CJY11)
关键词 专业志愿 职业决策 职业生涯辅导 majors selection career decision-making career counseling
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1李虹.大学生自尊状况的调查研究[J].心理与行为研究,2003,1(2):133-136. 被引量:40
  • 2杨治良,李朝旭.局中人和局外人的决策差异研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1282-1287. 被引量:20
  • 3杨福义,梁宁建.内隐自尊与外显自尊的关系:多重内隐测量的视角[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):785-790. 被引量:41
  • 4张凤华,邱江,邱桂凤,张庆林.决策中的框架效应再探[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):886-890. 被引量:34
  • 5Anderson, L. R., & Mellor, J. M. (2008). Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 1260-1274.
  • 6Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2006). Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 19, 307-322.
  • 7Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
  • 8Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000).Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personalty and Soctal Psychology,79, 1022-1038.
  • 9Hsee, K. C., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: self-others discrepancies in risk Preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 126, 45-53.
  • 10McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects: An analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610-617.

共引文献37

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部