期刊文献+

消费者对不同社会距离下他人评价的反应 被引量:3

The Reaction of Consumers to Others' Assessments under Different Social Distances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探究不同调节定向类型的消费者对不同社会距离他人评价的反应,采用2(调节定向:促进VS预防)×2(社会距离:社会远距离VS社会近距离)×2(评价属性:积极VS消极)实验设计的方法,结果发现,促进定向的消费者更愿意接受社会远距离他人的评价,预防定向的消费者更愿意接受社会近距离他人的评价。促进定向的消费者受社会远距离他人的积极评价影响更显著,预防定向的消费者受社会近距离他人的消极评价影响更显著。 This study explored the reaction to others' assessments of consumers who are of different types of regulatory focus to others' assessments under different social distances. The experiment adopted the setting as 2 (Regulatory Focus: promotion orientation VS prevention orientation) × 2 (Social Distance: social distance VS social close)× 2 (Evaluation attribute: positive VS negative). It is found that consumers with promotion orientation are more willing to accept the assessments from distant others while consumers with prevention orientation are more will to accept the assessments from close others. In addition, the prominent impact is found when consumers with promotion orientation get positive assessments from distant others, or when consumers with prevention orientation get negative assessments from close others.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期1396-1402,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71072159) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(12QN047)
关键词 解释水平 社会距离 促进定向 预防定向 construal level social distance promotion orientation prevention orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献125

  • 1Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308.
  • 2Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
  • 3Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
  • 4Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
  • 5Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 6Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232.
  • 7Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: the role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448.
  • 8Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus Theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86, 35-66.
  • 9Broekner, J., Paruchuri, S., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 5-24.
  • 10Higgins E T.Beyond pleasure and pain.American Psychologist,1997,52(12):1280-1300.

共引文献267

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部