期刊文献+

不同分辨率锥形束CT和全景片在根尖吸收诊断中的对比研究 被引量:4

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with different voxel resolutions and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated apical root resorption
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同分辨率锥形束CT(CBCT)和全景片在根尖吸收诊断中的差异。方法选取160颗单根前磨牙,用以模拟4种不同程度的根尖吸收:无(完整的牙根)、轻度(根尖区近中、远中、颊面、舌面1.0 mm直径和深度的洞形)、中度(0.4、0.8、1.2、1.6 mm根尖缩短)、重度(2.4、2.8、3.2、3.6 mm根尖缩短)。模拟完成后,对所有牙齿拍摄CBCT(0.2和0.3 mm分辨率)和全景片获取3组X线图像。经校正后,3名正畸临床医师通过对图像资料的分析对所有样本的根尖吸收程度进行诊断。采用McNemar检验对比分析采用不同成像技术诊断不同程度根尖吸收的正确率。结果采用全景片诊断全部根尖吸收样本的正确率为57.5%,而采用0.2和0.3 mm分辨率CBCT的正确率分别为85%和81.3%。对全部样本的诊断,0.2 mm分辨率CBCT和全景片以及0.3 mm分辨率CBCT和全景片的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。然而,对无、轻度、重度和全部根尖吸收样本的诊断,0.2和0.3 mm分辨率CBCT间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比于全景片,CBCT对根尖吸收具有更高的检出率。在根尖吸收的诊断中,0.2和0.3 mm分辨率CBCT诊断效能无明显差异,但0.3 mm分辨率CBCT对患者的辐射水平更低。 Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) with different voxel resolutions and panoramic radiography for the detection of simulated extemal apical root resorption(EARR) in vitro. Methods The study sample consisted of 160 single-rooted premolars for simulating EARR of varying degrees according to four setups: no(intact teeth), mild(cavity of 1.0 mm in diameter and depth on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual root surface), moderate(0.4, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 mm root shortening), and severe (2.4, 2.8, 3.2, and 3.6 mm root shortening). These teeth were imaged by CBCT with two different voxel sizes(0.2 and 0.3 mm) and panoramic radiography. Each root was classified according to defect size(no, mild, moderate, and severe) by three calibrated observers using CBCT and panoramic images. McNemar tests were performed to compare the proportions of correct classification between the methods(0.2 mm voxel vs. 0.3 mm voxel, 0.2 mm voxel vs. panoramic, and 0.3 mm voxel vs. panoramic) for each degree of EARR. Results For panoramic radiography, 57.5% of all samples were correctly classified compared with 85% for 0.2 mm voxel and 81.3% for 0.3 mm voxel, and the differences were significant(P〈0.01) between both 0.2 mm voxel and 0.3 mm voxel and panoramic radiography. However, no significant difference was observed between 0.2 mm voxel and 0.3 mm voxel in correct classification for no, mild, severe, and all samples(P〉0.05). Conclusion CBCT imaging was more reliable than panoramic radiography for detecting simulated EARR. The 0.3 mm voxel resolution was the better configuration because performed the same as the 0.2 mm voxel resolution in diagnosing simulated EARR but with lower exposure to X-rays .
作者 任洪芋 陈昕
出处 《国际口腔医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期514-517,共4页 International Journal of Stomatology
关键词 锥形束CT 分辨率 全景片 根尖吸收 cone-beam computed tomography voxel resolutions panoramic radiography apical root resorption
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Alexander Dudic,Catherine Giannopoulou,Michael Leuzinger,Stavros Kiliaridis.Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution[J].American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics.2009(4)
  • 2Rudolf Boeddinghaus,Andy Whyte.Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging[J].European Journal of Radiology.2007(3)
  • 3Donald A. Tyndall,Sonali Rathore.Cone-Beam CT Diagnostic Applications: Caries, Periodontal Bone Assessment, and Endodontic Applications[J].Dental Clinics of North America.2008(4)
  • 4Senem Yi?it ?zer.Detection of Vertical Root Fractures by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Variable Voxel Sizes in an In Vitro Model[J].Journal of Endodontics.2011(1)
  • 5Maria Alves Garcia Silva,Ulrich Wolf,Frank Heinicke,Axel Bumann,Heiko Visser,Edgar Hirsch.Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation[J].American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics.2008(5)
  • 6John F. Sherrard,P. Emile Rossouw,Byron W. Benson,Roberto Carrillo,Peter H. Buschang.Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs[J].American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics.2010(4)
  • 7Ali Alqerban,Reinhilde Jacobs,Paulo Couto Souza,Guy Willems.In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors[J].American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics.2009(6)
  • 8F. S.Neves,T. V.Vasconcelos,S. L. A.Vaz,D. Q.Freitas,F.Haiter‐Neto.Evaluation of reconstructed images with different voxel sizes of acquisition in the diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using cone beam computed tomography[J].International Endodontic Journal.2012(3)

同被引文献26

  • 1王劲茗,陆笑,汪永跃,王虎.数字化曲面体层摄影种植床失真率的定量研究[J].广东牙病防治,2007,15(7):294-295. 被引量:11
  • 2Taithong chai R, Sookkom K, Killiany DM. Facial and dento alveolar structure and the prediction of apical root shortening[ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996,110:296 - 302.
  • 3Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging [ J ]. Eur J Radio1,2008,66 ( 3 ) : 396 - 418.
  • 4Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape :periapical vs panoramic films[ J. Angle Orthod ,2001,71 (3) : 185 - 189.
  • 5Cohenca N,Simon JH, Mathur A, et al. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento - alveolar trauma[ J ]. Dent Traumato1,2007,23 (2) : 105 -113.
  • 6Yamada K, Saitol, Hanada K, et al. Observation of three cases of tem- poromandibular joint osteoarthritis and mandibular morphology during adolescence using helical CT [ J ]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2004,31:298 - 305.
  • 7Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT de- vices and 64 -slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology[ J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod ,2008,106 (1) :106 - 114.
  • 8Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between ef- fective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxil|o- facial applications[J]. Eur J Radiol,2009,71 (3) :461 -468.
  • 9Battling SH, Majdani O, Gupta R, et al. Large scan field, high spatial resolution flat - panel detector based volumetric CT of the whole hu- man skull base and for maxillofacial imaging [ J ]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2007,36(6) :317 -327.
  • 10Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, da Silveira HL, et al. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption[ J ]. J Endod ,2009,35 (2) :233 - 235.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部