期刊文献+

横向并购的单边效应模拟分析——以东航并购上航案为例 被引量:4

Simulation Analysis on Unilateral Effects of Horizontal Merger:The Case of Eastern Airlines Merging Shanghai Airlines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以东方航空公司并购上海航空公司为例,分别使用结构分析方法和模拟分析方法评估横向并购的单边效应。研究发现,尽管航空客运市场的集中度较高,有可能会出现滥用市场势力的单边行为,但是东方航空公司与上海航空公司的重组合并带来的效率提升抵减了其合并可能产生的价格上涨效应。 This paper evaluates and analyzes the unilateral effects of horizontal mergers respectively u- sing structural analysis and simulation analysis by discussing the case of Eastern Airlines merging Shanghai Airlines. The study discovers that the efficiency gains which the reorganization of Eastern Airlines and Shanghai Airlines offsets the prices effects of the restructure, in spite of possibility of abusing the market power and high concentration of the air passenger market.
作者 余东华 刘滔
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期132-137,共6页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"横向并购反垄断控制中的效率抗辩研究"(11FJL013) 山东大学青年学术团队项目"转型期中国反垄断问题研究"(IFYT12072)
关键词 横向并购 单边效应 模拟分析 航空公司并购案 horizontal mergers unilateral effects simulation analysis airline company merger case
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1Buccirossi, P. , Handbook of Antitrust Economics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2008.
  • 2Scheffman, D. , Malcolm Coate and Louis Silvia, 2003, "Twenty Years of Merger Guidelines Enforcement at the FTC: An Economic Perspective", Antitrust Law Journal, (71) : 277-318.
  • 3ICN( International Competition Network), Report on Merger Guidelines, April 2004, Chapter 3, 1.28. available at http://www, internationalcompetitionnetwork. org/media/library/conference_3rd_seoul_2004/vickers. pdf.
  • 4Ivaldi, M. and F. Verboven, 2005," Quantifying the Effects from Horizontal Mergers in European Competition Policy",International Journal of Industrial Organization, (23) : 669-691.
  • 5Abere, A., O.Capps Jr, J. Church, H. A. Love. Mergers and Market Power: Estimating the Effect on Market Power of the Proposed Acquisition by the Coca-Cola Company of Cadbury Schweppes' Carbonated Soft Drinks in Canada[A], in Slottje, D. J. Measuring Market Power[C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002.
  • 6Barnett, A. William. Theoretical Foundations for the Rotterdam Model [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1979, 46(1).
  • 7Barnett, A. W., O. Seck. Rotterdam Model Versus Almost Ideal Demand System: Will the Best Specification Please Stand up[J]. Jounal of Applied Econometrics, 2008, 23(6).
  • 8Budzinski, O., I. Ruhmer. Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey [J]. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2009, 6(2).
  • 9Davis P., E. Garces. Quantitative Techniques for Competition and Antitrust Analysis [A]. London: Princeton University Press, 2009.
  • 10Deaton A, J.Muellbauer. An Almost Ideal Demand System[J]. American Economic Review, 1980, 70(3).

共引文献115

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部