中文版Friedman-Bendas考试焦虑量表在中学生群体中的试用

Reliability and Validity of the Friedman-Bendas Test Anxiety Scale in Chinese Middle School Students

目的：对中文版Friedman—Bendas考试焦虑量表（FBTAS）在中学生群体中进行信效度检验。方法：通过4次抽样，初次调查20人对FBTAS进行通俗度检验；再测调查465人进行探索性因素分析确定正式的中文版FBTAS；正式调查632人进行验证性因素分析；被试同时完成FBTAS与一般焦虑量表（GADS），简式版害怕他人消极评价量表（FNES—B）与Buss—Perry攻击性量表（BPAQ）来考核效标效度；另外抽取47人进行四周后重测。结果：中文版FB．TAS分为紧张焦虑、社会贬抑和认知阻滞3个维度，总量表和分量表的a系数在0．71～0．89之间，四周重测组内相关系数在0．78～0．89之间，用随机截距模型控制方法效应后的主要拟合指标x2／df=-2．82，CFI=0．89，TLI=0．86，SRMR=0．06，RMSEA=0．05。FBTAS与GADS的相关为0．55，与FNES—B的相关为0．42，与BPAQ的相关为0．35（均P〈0．01）。结论：中文版FBTAS具有较好的信效度，是测量中学生考试焦虑的适宜工具。

Objective： To introduce Friedman-Bendas Test Anxiety Scale（FBTAS）, and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese middle school students. Methods： Based on the online Chinese Version of FBTAS, the researchers investigated 465 students for exploratory factor analysis（EFA）. Succeeding, 632 students were asked to complete a battery of structured questionnaires, including the Chinese version of FBTAS, Generally Anxiety Disorder Scale（GADS）, Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale- Brief Version（FNES-B）, Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire（BPAQ）. Then the confirmatory factor anal- ysis was further performed to examine the construct validity. 47 students were retested after four weeks for the test-retest reliability investigation. Results： The Random Intercept Model of CFA showed that the structure of the FBTAS is satisfactory： x2/d/=-2.82, CFI=0.89, TLI=0.86, SRMR=0.06, RMSEA=0.05. The Cronbach＇ s alpha coefficient of the FBTAS and its subscales ranged from 0.71 to 0.89. The test-retest reliabilities（4 weeks interval） were 0.78-0.89（ICC）. For the total score of FBTAS, the correlation coefficients with GADS, FNES-B and BPAQ were 0.55, 0.42 and 0.35 respectively（Ps〈0.01）. Conclusion： Chinese Version of FBTAS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing text anxiety in Chinese students.