期刊文献+

中国商业银行社会责任的动因与社会绩效 被引量:1

The Motivation of Chinese Commercial Bank's Social Responsibility and Its Social Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以制度理论和Carroll的企业社会责任动因三维模型为依据,分析2008~2011年中国商业银行的财务数据、社会责任报告、媒体报道和监管规定,研究企业社会责任的决定性因素,以及企业社会绩效和滞后一年的经济绩效的关系。研究发现:监管压力、净利率与企业社会绩效正相关,而成本收入比与企业社会绩效负相关;与非上市银行相比,上市银行(包括四大国有控股银行)的社会绩效更高;与城市商业银行相比,股份制商业银行的社会绩效更高;此外,企业社会绩效与企业滞后一年的净利率正相关,与滞后一年的成本收入比负相关。提高社会绩效需要监管部门和商业银行的共同努力。 Based on the institutional theory and Carroll's three-domain model of corporate social responsibility, this paper analyses the financial data, social responsibility reports, media reports and regulatory requirements of Chinese commercial banks, and researches the determinants of corporate social responsibility and the relationship between corporate social perfor- mance and economic performance one year later. It is found that regulatory pressure and net interest positively correlate with corporate social performance, but the ratio of cost to income is negatively correlates with the performance; compared to non-list- ed banks, listed banks (including the four-largest state-owned banks) have better social performance; compared to city commer- cial banks, joint-stock commercial banks have better social performance. In addition, corporate social performance positively correlate with corporate net interest one year later, and negatively correlates with the ratio of cost to income one year later. The improvement in social performance needs commercial banks and regulators to work together.
作者 朱蓉
机构地区 北京工商大学
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期38-44,52,共8页 Finance Forum
基金 北京工商大学青年教师科研启动基金项目"语料库视角的中国商业银行制度合法性研究"(QNJJ2012-06)
关键词 商业银行 企业社会责任 监管压力 社会绩效 经济绩效 commercial bank corporate social responsibility regulatory pressure social performance economic performance
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献52

  • 1陈信元,江峰.事件模拟与非正常收益模型的检验力——基于中国A股市场的经验检验[J].会计研究,2005(7):25-31. 被引量:47
  • 2于坤章,袁金魁.转移障碍、顾客满意和顾客保持之信度与效度分析[J].现代管理科学,2005(9):68-69. 被引量:3
  • 3王海燕,陈五洲.企业慈善的时代价值及其在中国的实践探索[J].长江论坛,2006(5):29-32. 被引量:7
  • 4Franklin D. Just Good Business : A Special Report on Corporate Social Responsibility [ J ]. The Economist, 2008, January (19) : 3 -6.
  • 5Kotler Philip, Nancy Lee. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause[ M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,2004:3 -4.
  • 6Lichtenstein, Donald R, Minette E Drumwright, Bridgette M Braig. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Custom- er Donations to Corporate - Supported Nonprofits [ J ]. Journal of Marketing,2004,68(4) : 16 -32.
  • 7Vlachos P A, et al. Corporate Social Responsibility: Attributions, Loyalty, and the Mediting Role of Trust [ J ]. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science,2009,37(2) : 170- 180.
  • 8Bhattacharya C B, Sen Sankar. Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives [J]. California Management Review,2004,47 (1) : 9 -24.
  • 9Crosby L A,Johnson S L. Corporate Citizenship: It's the Brand [J]. Marketing Management,2006,15(5) : 12 - 13.
  • 10Fielding M. Companies that Behave Responsibly Earn Good Rep, Consumers' Attention [ J ]. Marketing News, 2007 (41) : 17 -18.

共引文献70

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部