期刊文献+

Presence of notched QRS on paced electrocardiographs as a predictor of poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy 被引量:1

Presence of notched QRS on paced electrocardiographs as a predictor of poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on patients with advanced and refractory heart failure has made remarkable progress.Clinically,notched QRS (nQRS) is commonly seen on electrocardiographs (ECGs) with bundle branch block morphology and on paced ECGs after implantation of a CRT device,which may reflect the heterogeneity of ventricular myocardial depolarization and electrical activity.The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with more nQRS myocardial segments on paced ECGs had a worse response to CRT than patients with fewer nQRS myocardial segments.Methods We prospectively enrolled 56 patients of CRT with chronic heart failure from People's Hospital affiliated to Peking University from January 2007 to October 2013.Based on nQRS segments on ECGs before CRT,we allocated them to two groups:fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments (lateral,inferior,anterior segments) group (F-nQRS,G1,n=23) and more nQRS (≥2) myocardial segments group (M-nQRS,G2,n=33).Then according to nQRS segments on ECGs after CRT,we divided them into two groups similarly:fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments group (G3,n=24) and more nQRS (≥2) myocardial segments group (G4,n=32).This study was approved by the ethics committee of People's Hospital.Results At 6 months in the baseline-ECG group,there was a greater absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in G2 than in G1 ((11.5±8.9)% vs.(5.5±10.4)%,P=0.023),with the incidence of nonresponse lower in G2than in G1 (9.1% vs.39.1%,P=0.018).In the paced-ECG group,the absolute increase in LVEF was less in G4 than in G3 ((6.4±8.8)% vs.(12.5±10.4)%,P=0.024) and the incidence of nonresponse was higher in G4 than in G3 (31.3% vs.8.3%,P=0.039).Multivariate analysis showed that fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments on paced ECGs (odds ratio 13.920) was a predictor of positive response to CRT.Conclusion nQRS ≥2 myocardial segments (lateral,inferior,anterior) on paced ECGs may predict a poor response to CRT. Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on patients with advanced and refractory heart failure has made remarkable progress.Clinically,notched QRS (nQRS) is commonly seen on electrocardiographs (ECGs) with bundle branch block morphology and on paced ECGs after implantation of a CRT device,which may reflect the heterogeneity of ventricular myocardial depolarization and electrical activity.The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with more nQRS myocardial segments on paced ECGs had a worse response to CRT than patients with fewer nQRS myocardial segments.Methods We prospectively enrolled 56 patients of CRT with chronic heart failure from People's Hospital affiliated to Peking University from January 2007 to October 2013.Based on nQRS segments on ECGs before CRT,we allocated them to two groups:fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments (lateral,inferior,anterior segments) group (F-nQRS,G1,n=23) and more nQRS (≥2) myocardial segments group (M-nQRS,G2,n=33).Then according to nQRS segments on ECGs after CRT,we divided them into two groups similarly:fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments group (G3,n=24) and more nQRS (≥2) myocardial segments group (G4,n=32).This study was approved by the ethics committee of People's Hospital.Results At 6 months in the baseline-ECG group,there was a greater absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in G2 than in G1 ((11.5±8.9)% vs.(5.5±10.4)%,P=0.023),with the incidence of nonresponse lower in G2than in G1 (9.1% vs.39.1%,P=0.018).In the paced-ECG group,the absolute increase in LVEF was less in G4 than in G3 ((6.4±8.8)% vs.(12.5±10.4)%,P=0.024) and the incidence of nonresponse was higher in G4 than in G3 (31.3% vs.8.3%,P=0.039).Multivariate analysis showed that fewer nQRS (〈2) myocardial segments on paced ECGs (odds ratio 13.920) was a predictor of positive response to CRT.Conclusion nQRS ≥2 myocardial segments (lateral,inferior,anterior) on paced ECGs may predict a poor response to CRT.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第15期2727-2734,共8页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 cardiac resynchronization therapy ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY notched QRS cardiac resynchronization therapy electrocardiography notched QRS
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Bleeker GB, Schalij M J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Steendijk P, Molhoek SG, van Erven L, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts right ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coil Cardiol 2005, 46: 2264- 2269.
  • 2Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005, 352: 1539-1549.
  • 3Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I, Hall W J, McNitt S, Brown M, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT- CRT). Circulation 2011, 123: 1061-1072.
  • 4Mollema SA, Bleeker GB, van der Wall EE, Schalij M J, Bax JJ. Usefulness of QRS duration to predict response to cardiacresynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Am J Cardio12007, 100: 1665-1670.
  • 5Richardson M, Freemantle N, Calvert M J, Cleland JG, Tavazzi L. Predictors and treatment response with cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure characterized by dyssynchrony: a pre-defined analysis from the CARE-HF trial. Eur Heart J 2007, 28: 1827-1834.
  • 6Taylor J. New clinically oriented guidelines classify bradyarrhythmias by mechanism and guide choice of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Eur Heart J 2013, 34: 2221-2222.
  • 7Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 2013, 34: 2281-2329.
  • 8Exner DV, Birnie DH, Moe G, Thibault B, Philippon F, Healey JS, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines on the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy: evidence and patient selection. Can J Cardio12013, 29: 182-195.
  • 9Linde C, Ellenbogen K, McAlister FA. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): clinical trials, guidelines, and target populations. Heart Rhythm 2012, 9 Suppl: $3-S13.
  • 10Gorcsan JR. Finding pieces of the puzzle of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 2011, 123:10-12.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部