2Bae HS, Chung YW, Kim T,et al. The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is de-] pendent on age and disease severity [ J ]. Acta Obstet Gy-] necol Scand,2013,92(2):185-192 |.
4Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cer- vical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors [ J ]. J Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2013,17 ( 5 ) : 1-27.
6Phongnarisorn C, Srisomboon J, Khunamornpong S, et al. The risk of residual neoplasia in women with microinva- sire squamous cervical carcinoma and positive cone mar- gins [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2006,16 ( 2 ) : 655-659.
7Shaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, et al. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia[ J]. Int J Gyne- col Pathol,2014.33( 1 ) :83-88.
9Costa S, De Nuzzo M, Infante FE, et al. Disease persist- ence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization [ J ]. Gynecol On- col ,2002,85 ( 1 ) : 119-124.
10Orbo A, Arnesen T, Ames M, et al. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway : a ret- rospective long-term follow-up material [ J ]. Gynecol On- col, 2004,93 (2) : 479 -483.
7Siriaree S, Srisomboon J. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop electrosurgical excision: what should a clinician do, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2006,7:463-466.
8中华医学会妇瘤分会.妇科常见肿瘤诊治指南.第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:27-33.
9KimHJ, Kim KR, Mok JE, et al. Pathology risk factor for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization. Gynecol Oncol,2007 ,83 :434-438.
10Narducci F, Occelli B. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion. Gynecol Oncol, 2000,76 : 311-314.
