期刊文献+

基于英特尔未来教育视野课堂的重新定义

Redefining the Classroom Teaching——Based on the “Intel Teach to the Future”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英特尔未来教育的教学模式和教学理念,为基础教育信息化敞开了一扇门,让人们看到了信息技术与课堂教学的有效融合。结合"英特尔未来教育"理念,本文重新定义了课堂的教学设计理念、教学目标、教学活动、课堂评价及教师角色,并从学生参与程度、课堂活动、学生认知能力及学生的发展等方面分析了重新定义的课堂教学效果。结果表明,将英特尔未来教育的理念有效地融入学科课程,可以提升学生的学习兴趣,增强学生的创新思维能力、自主学习能力等,同时可以帮助教师构建以学生为中心的研究性课堂教学模式和问题导向式教学模式。 The Intel future education teaching mode and teaching idea opened a door for basic education informatization, enabling people to see the effective integration of information technology and classroom teaching. This paper, by integrating the idea of "Intel teach to the future", rede- fined the teaching design, teaching objectives, teaching activities, classroom assessment and teacher's role, and re--evaluate the classroom teaching effect from the perspective of student's participation, classroom activity, student's cognitive competence and development. The results showed that the students' involvement and interest in learning, creative thinking ability, independent learn- ing ability were improved; meanwhile, it also helped the teacher establish a research--oriented teaching mode and problem based teaching mode.
出处 《高等继续教育学报》 2014年第4期71-75,共5页 Journal of Continuing Higher Education
基金 新疆教育学院科研课题基金项目(XJJY201227)
关键词 课堂教学 重新定义 英特尔未来教育 信息技术 Classroom teaching redefine Intel Future Education information technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1英特尔公司.英特尔未来教育[EB/OL].[2014-03-30].http://www.teachfuture.com/mainpage.aspx.
  • 2张华.课程与教学论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.71.
  • 3英特尔公司.英特尔未来教育项目核心课程(V10)[M].英特尔公司出版,2013.
  • 4中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育数学课程标准(2011版)[S].北京:北京师范大学出版集团,2012.
  • 5英特尔教育.评价项目:评价策略[EB/OL].[2014-03-30].http://www.intel.cn/content/www/cn/zh/educa.tion/k12/assessing-projects/strategies.html.
  • 6姚梅林.从认知到情境:学习范式的变革[J].教育研究,2003,24(2):60-64. 被引量:319

二级参考文献22

  • 1Weinstein,C. , Ridley,D. S. , Dahl,T. , & Weber,E. S.Helping students develop strategies for effective learning.Educational Leadership, 1988/1989, 46(6) : 17- 19.
  • 2Schoenfeld, A. H. Mathematical problem solving.Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985.
  • 3Bandura ,A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 1982, 37 : 122- 147.
  • 4Ames, C. Classrooms : goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84: 261-271.
  • 5Levine, J. M. , Resnick,L. B. & Higgins,E. T. Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 1993,44:585-612.
  • 6Wittrock, M. C. ,& Alesandrini, K. Generation of summaries and analogies and anslytic and holistic abilities.American Educational Research Journal, 1990, 27 : 489- 502.
  • 7Zimmerman,B. & Schunk,D. (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achirvement: Theory, research, and practice. NY: Springer, 1989.
  • 8Bereiter ,C. Situated cognition and how to overcome it. D.Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.) Situated cognition: Social,semiotic, and psychological perspectives. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. 281-300.
  • 9Lave, J. Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levin, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association, 1991. 489-502.
  • 10White, B. Y. ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education [J]. Cognition and Instruction,1993, 10:1-100.

共引文献391

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部