多团队系统协作机制对研发团队绩效的影响机理——基于团队跨界行为的中介效应被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要研究团队跨界行为在多团队系统协作机制和研发团队绩效间的中介效应,构建概念模型,并提出研究假设。运用结构方程模型对整体模型进行假设检验和路径分析,并检验各研究变量之间的影响关系及其效果。结果表明,多团队系统协作机制、团队跨界行为对研发团队绩效产生显著影响;团队跨界行为中的使节行为和协调行为在多团队系统协作机制与研发团队绩效间起到部分中介效用,侦测行为没有起到中介效用。

作者孙贺强林巨伟

机构地区哈尔滨工程大学

出处《经济研究导刊》 2014年第24期186-188,共3页 Economic Research Guide

关键词多团队系统协作机制团队跨界行为研发团队绩效

分类号 F240 [经济管理—劳动经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1奉小斌.研发团队跨界行为对创新绩效的影响——任务复杂性的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(3):56-65. 被引量：34
2Mathieu J E, Marks M A, Zaccaro S J.Muhi--team systems[A].Anderson N, Ones D S, Sinangil H K, Viswesvarn C.Organiational Psychology: Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology[C].2001,2: 290.
3肖余春,沈淑红,郑喜燕.多团队系统协作机制的结构方程模型研究——以高新技术企业NPD多团队系统为例[J].科学学研究,2013,31(3):422-429. 被引量：9
4Marks M A, Mathieu J E,Zaccaro S J.A teamporally based framework and taxonomy ofteam processes[J].Academy of Management Review, 2001,26: 356-376.
5Ancona D G, Caldwell D F.Bridging the boundary:External activaniity and performance in organizational teams[J].Administrat, on Quarterly, 1992,37(4) : 634-665.
6Joshi A,Pandey N, Han G H.Braeketing team boundary spanning:An examination of task--based,team--level, and contextual anteeedents[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30(6):731-759.
7Stock R M.Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners between supplier and customer eompanies[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006,34(4) : 588-599.
8Minbashian A, Wood RE, Beckmann N.Task-contingent Conscientiousness as A Unit of Personality at Work[J].Journal of Applied Psychology.2010,95(5): 793-806.
9Choi J M.Extemal activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development[J].Small Group Research, 2002,33(2): 181-208.

二级参考文献45

1Faraj S, Yah A. Boundary work in knowledge teams [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009,94 ( 3 ) : 604 - 617.
2Ancona D G, Caldwell D F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992,37 ( 4 ) :634 - 665.
3Choi J M. External activities and team effectiveness : Review and theoretical development [ J ]. Small Group Research,2002,33(2) :181 -208.
4Marrone J A, Tesluk P E, Carson J B, A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary spanning behavior [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50 (6) : 1423 - 1439.
5Marrone J A. Team boundary spanning : A muhilevel review of past research and proposals for the future [ J ]. Journal of Management,2010,36 (4) :911 - 940.
6Druskat V U, Kayes D C. The antecedents of team competence: Toward a fine-grained model of selfmanaging team effectiveness [ C] //Neale M A, Mannix E A. Research on managing groups and teams. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. 1999.
7Hambrick D C. Corporate coherence and the top management team [ C ] //Hambrick D C, Nadler D A, Tushman M L. Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation. Boston: Havard Bussiness School Press, 1998 : 123 - 140.
8Bettencourt L A, Brown S W. Role stressors and customer oriented boundary spanning behaviors in service organizations [ J ]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2003,31 (4) :394 - 408.
9Joshi A, Pandey N, Han G H. Bracketing team boundary spanning : An examination of task-based, team-level, and contextual antecedents [ J ]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30 (6) :731 - 759.
10Tushman M L. Special boundary roles in the innovation process [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1977, 22(4) :587 -605.