期刊文献+

内隐启动条件下权力对人际敏感性的影响 被引量:5

The Effects of Power on Interpersonal Sensitivity under the Condition of Implicit Priming
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用内隐权力启动方法,探讨权力对人际敏感性的影响。结果发现,性别和权力启动的交互作用显著,不管男生还是女生中,高权力启动组人际敏感性成绩均显著高于低权力启动组。但是,男生中,高权力启动组得分显著高于控制组,控制组得分与低权力启动组差异不显著;女生中,高权力启动组得分与控制组差异不显著,低权力启动组得分显著低于控制组;而在控制组中,男生得分接近显著低于女生。权力启动、权力特质和性别三者间的交互效应接近显著,"权力启动"和"性别"的交互效应在个体权力特质指向"高权力特质"水平上时显著。结果表明,内隐启动条件下,权力影响人际敏感性,且这种影响存在着性别和权力特质的差异。 This study investigated the effect of power to interpersonal sensitivity on the condition of implicit priming. The study found that the significant interaction effect between gender and the priming of power. Whether in boys or girls,high- power people were more interpersonally sensitive than low- power people. For boys,high- power people were more interpersonally sensitive than the contral group,and there were no significant differences between the contral group and low- power people; For girls,low- power people were less interpersonally sensitive than the contral group,there were no significant differences between the high- power and the contral group. For the contral group,the boys were less interpersonally sensitive than the girls. There was edge significant interaction effect between the implicit priming of power,power trait and gender; the interaction effect between gender and the priming of power were significant on the level of high power traits. The results showed that power effects interpersonal sensitivity on the condition of implicit priming,and the effects has also been influenced by gender and power traits.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2014年第4期355-360,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31171003)
关键词 内隐启动 权力 权力特质 人际敏感性 implicit priming power power traits interpersonal sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1李小平,杨晟宇,李梦遥.权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响[J].心理学报,2012,44(7):964-971. 被引量:33
  • 2林怡秀,李怡青.(2011).非语言敏感度:权力差异与不同社会角色期待的效果探讨.教育与心理研究(台湾),34(1),55-77.
  • 3刘新丰.(2010).特质-角色权力匹配对自我表现及自评-他评一致性的影响.硕士毕业论文.重庆:西南大学.
  • 4张珊明,钟毅平,罗伏生,陈芸.人际敏感性的概念及其测量[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(5):606-609. 被引量:7
  • 5钟毅平,张珊明,陈芸.不同权力者人际敏感性的差异[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(1):62-65. 被引量:13
  • 6Anderson, C. , & Berdahl, J. ( 2002 ). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362 - 1377.
  • 7Anderson, C. , & Galinsky, A. D. ( 2006 ). Power, optimism, and risk - taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36 (4), 511 -536.
  • 8Ambady, N. , & Gray, H. M. (2002). On being sad and mistak- en : Mood effects on the accuracy of thin - slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 ( 4 ), 947 - 961.
  • 9Bem,S. (1981). Gender schema theory:A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review ,88,354 - 364.
  • 10Chen,S. , Lee - Chai, A. Y. , & Bargh, J. A. ( 2001 ). Relation- ship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80,183 - 187.

二级参考文献81

  • 1Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • 2Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-91.
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 4Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2005). The subjective sense of power: Structure and antecedents. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley.
  • 5Arendt, H. (1961). Between Past and Future. New York: The Viking Press.
  • 6Benjamin, A. J. (2006). The relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and attitudes toward violence: Further validation of the attitudes toward violence scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 923-926.
  • 7Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
  • 9Crowson, H. M., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. (2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 571-592.
  • 10Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.

共引文献48

同被引文献65

  • 1刘博宇,陈利.关于性别角色认同研究的深层思考[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,27(6):60-62. 被引量:32
  • 2罗春明,黄希庭.宽恕的心理学研究[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):908-915. 被引量:68
  • 3张洪英,高丽娟.刻板印象稳定性的理论分析[J].理论学刊,2005(3):106-108. 被引量:8
  • 4肖诗来.(2010).父母教养方式,自我关注与大学生自我和谐的关系研究.华东师范大学硕士学位论文.
  • 5Anderson, C., John, O.P., & Keltner, D. (2012).The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2),313-344.
  • 6Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269-309.
  • 7Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187.
  • 8DeWaU, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Gitter, S. A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). It's the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. Journal of personality and social psycholosy, 96(1), 45-59.
  • 9Inesi, M. E. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizagonal Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 58-69.
  • 10Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部