期刊文献+

Macondo深水井漏油事故防喷器系统失效原因分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Deepwater BOP Failure in the Macondo Well Accident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 深水防喷器系统是深水井控的核心设备,它的失效是导致Macondo深水井漏油事故的重要原因之一。为了识别Macondo井防喷器系统的主要失效原因,采用故障树分析法结合其防喷器失效过程进行分析,建立了具有14个基本事件的系统失效故障树。通过求解故障树的最小割集和径集,分别找出了系统失效的10种模式,对基本事件进行结构重要度计算,结果表明,剪切面有钻杆接头、内BOP阀门未关闭、水下蓄能器漏失等是导致系统失效的主要原因。对Macondo井防喷器系统失效概率的近似计算与实际情况相符,验证了失效原因分析的正确性。该研究有助于对Macondo深水井漏油事故的进一步分析,对深水防喷器的设计和选用也具有一定的理论指导作用和参考价值。 Deepwater BOP system is the core equipment for deepwater well control.It was the failure of such system that led to the oil spill of Macondo well.To understand why such failure occurred,the fault tree analysis was made,and together with the analysis of failure process,a fault tree for system failure with14 events was built.By solving the minimal cut sets and path sets,10 failure modes are identified to calculate the structural importance for basic events,it was found that the BOP system failure in Macondo accident was mainly attributed to shear plane on pipe joints,inside BOP valve not closed,and leakage of underwater hydraulic accumulator.The probability value of the BOP system failure is consistent with the real case of accident,which demonstrates the validity of the failure analysis.The research is favorable to further investigate the Macondo oil spill,and also provides a theoretical reference for design and application of deepwater BOP.
出处 《石油钻探技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期53-58,共6页 Petroleum Drilling Techniques
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"完井井控安全评估体系研究"(编号:10CX04035A)部分研究内容
关键词 深水钻井 防喷器 故障分析 风险分析 井控 Macondo井 deepwater drilling blowout preventer fault analysis risk analysis well control Macondo well
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Holand P.Reliability of subsea BOP systems for deepwater application[R] .STF38F97417,1997.
  • 2段明星,李明亮,陈瑞峰,万波.深水防喷器系统可靠性探讨[J].中国造船,2010,51(A02):297-302. 被引量:6
  • 3BP plc.Deepwater horizon accident investigation report[R] .2010.
  • 4Holand P,Awan H.Reliability of deepwater subsea BOP systems and well kicks[R] .Houston:ExproSoft Inc,2012.
  • 5Deepwater Horizon Study Group.Final report on the investigation of the Macondo Well blowout[R] .2011.
  • 6Transocean Inc.Macondo Well incident transocean investigation report[R] .2011.
  • 7刘刚,金业权.钻井井控风险分析与控制[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011.
  • 8刘绘珍,张力,王以群,赵贺永.故障树中最小割集和最小径集的改进算法[J].工业安全与环保,2006,32(4):58-59. 被引量:15
  • 9孙东平,姚奕,马瑞萍.故障树近似计算中最优权因子的选取[J].指挥控制与仿真,2006,28(3):96-98. 被引量:2
  • 10Pillay A,Wang J.A risk ranking approach incorporating fuzzy set theory and grey theory[J] .Engineering Reliability&System Safety,2003,79(1):61-67.

二级参考文献4

  • 1胡昌华 许化龙.控制系统故障诊断与容错控制的分析和设计[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2001..
  • 2金星 沈怀荣 文明.故障树定性分析的优化方法[J].指挥技术学院学报,2001,(6):27-29.
  • 3陆廷孝主编.可靠性设计与分析.北京:国防工业出版社,1996,183-185.
  • 4金星,洪延姬,文明,李俊美.大型武器装备安全可靠性分析优化方法[J].弹箭与制导学报,2002,22(2):1-3. 被引量:5

共引文献27

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部