期刊文献+

课程效能评价理论在物流专业课双语教学中的运用实践 被引量:2

Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Use of Practical Courses in Logistics Theory Bilingual Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文中运用课程效能评价理论对物流专业课双语教学中的教学环节、教学方法、试卷和学生运用专业外语的能力等方面的成效进行分析。对以往缺乏系统理论指导而进行的探索式双语教学的分析总结,对现有的专业课程设置、专业培养目标、双语教学管理和激励机制、授课方式、评价标准,以及如何提高学生的专业外语素养和运用能力进行了深入地思考,并提出了建议和对策。并提炼研究结论为:物流类专业课双语教学应依据专业培养方向和目标有序、适当地进行;物流类专业课双语教学的教材和教学要件的选用和建设,应该遵循适用和实用原则;物流类专业课双语教学的评价不能仅仅通过专家和学生对任课教师课堂评教的分数,学生的期末考试这类单一的途径完成;物流类专业课双语教学的教学方法和教学环境应进一步改进等。 Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of the theory of logistics courses Bilingual Teaching teaching,teaching methods,the papers and the effectiveness of the ability of students to use a foreign language and other aspects of professional analysis. Lack of systematic theoretical guidance for the past carried out exploratory analysis of bilingual teaching summary,the existing professional curriculum,professional training objectives,bilingual teaching management and incentives,teaching methods,evaluation criteria,and how to improve students' professional foreign language literacy and the ability to use in- depth thinking,and made recommendations and countermeasures. And refining study concludes: Logistics Bilingual teaching class professional training should be based on the direction and goals orderly and appropriate manner; Logistics Specialty bilingual teaching materials and teaching the elements of the selection and construction should follow applicable and practical principles; Logistics Specialty evaluation of bilingual education are not only experts and students through classroom teachers teaching evaluation scores,final exam students to complete such a single path; teaching methods and teaching environment Bilingual Teaching logistics category should be further improvement.
作者 夏露 李严锋
出处 《物流工程与管理》 2014年第7期284-287,共4页 Logistics Engineering and Management
基金 教育部高等学校物流类专业教学指导委员会 中国物流学会2010年度物流教改教研课题评比"一等奖"(课题编号:JYJ09005)
关键词 反应学习 行为结果 专业课程 双语教学 评价分析 response learning behavioral outcomes professional courses bilingual teaching evaluation and analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Scriven,M..The logic of evaluation[M].Port Reyes,CA:Edge Press,1980.
  • 2Kirkpatrick,D.L.(1994).Evaluating Training Programs:The Four Levels[M].San Francisco,CA:Berrett-Koehler.
  • 3Eisner,Elliot,W.(1985).The educational imagination:on the design and evaluation of school programs[M].New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • 4成晓毅.我国高校双语教学模式初探[J].西安外国语学院学报,2005,13(3):89-91. 被引量:93
  • 5蔡小烨,姚琳,段世红.双语教学浅析[J].计算机教育,2005(7):8-9. 被引量:6
  • 6[英]Jack C.Richards等.管燕红译.朗文语言教学及应用语言学词典[M].外语教学与研究出版社,2000:45.
  • 7Eisner,Elliot,W.(1985).The educational imagination:on the design and evaluation of school programs[M].New York:Macmillan Publishing Company,pp.45-48.
  • 8Sofo,Francesco.(2004).Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation[M].Canberra:University of Canberra subject guide,study guide and lectures,pp.23-27.
  • 9Brinkerhoff,O.(2001).Robert and Apking,Anne M.High Impact Learning:strategies for leveraging business results from trainning[M].Cambridge,M A:Perseus Publishing,pp.209-232.

二级参考文献21

共引文献97

同被引文献6

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部