摘要
在伦理思想的发展史中,墨家和亚里士多德的思想均为后来者研究伦理学提供了丰富的资源和依据。前者以"天下之治"的宏伟目标作为其伦理思想的出发点与落脚点;后者的"德行论"以一种自由独立的态度来阐发城邦人生的追求。两者的伦理内容都对"爱""义和公正"有着非常相似的阐发,但在细节的论述上却有着明显的差异。这不仅由不同的地理环境、政治环境、文化背景决定着,而且俩人的身份背景亦是他们思想区别的主要原因。
In the history of ethics ,the Mohist and Aristotelian ideas are latecomers research ethics provides a wealth of re-sources and basis .The former“world of governance”,the grand goal as a starting point and the end result of its ethics ;latter’s“moral theory”in a free and independent city-state approach to elucidate the pursuit of life .Both are the ethical content of“love”“righteousness and justice”has a very similar exposition ,but the details of the discussion ,but there is a clear difference .This is not only determined by the different geographical ,political ,environmental ,cultural background with ,but the identity of the two of them thought the background is also the main reason for the difference .
出处
《安顺学院学报》
2014年第4期90-91,共2页
Journal of Anshun University
关键词
墨子
亚里士多德
德性
爱
义
公正
Mozi
Aristotle
morality
love
righteousness
justice