期刊文献+

基于非零和博弈的快件检验监管困境的研究 被引量:1

Research on Regulatory of Inspection and Quarantine Based on Non-zero Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检验检疫是国际贸易中的重要环节,重点是要提高整个检验链的工作效率和国际贸易供应链的效率。检验链上的检验方和多方被检之间的非零和博弈模型中引入信用等级打分的机制,将利用信用度的不同和成本因素综合考虑,旨在解决有限的预算下资源的分配问题。求解出非零和博弈模型的纳什均衡解,从不同的阶段,对不同的预算进行分析得到给定参与者不同预算下的纳什均衡,以助于解决资源限定下的资源分配问题。 Inspection and quarantine is a very important active in international business. The main point is to discuss on the efficiency improvement of the inspection chain and supply chain in international trade. A non-zero game model between inspectees and inspector are considered with credit rating in the model. The model will consider the credit rating level and the cost of inspection act to solve the arrangement of resource on limit budget. All the Nash equilibriums of the non-zero game can be found in different budget. This solution could help the decision maker to figure out the way to allocate limit resources appropriately.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2014年第23期130-134,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71301101) 教育部博士点基金项目(20113121120002)资助
关键词 检验链 非零和博弈 监管困境 信用等级 inspection chain non-zero game regulatory quandary credit rating
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Alm J, McKee M, Tax compliance as a coordination game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization ,2004 ;8 : 297-312.
  • 2Hohzaki R. An inspection game with smuggler' s decision on the amount of contraband. The Operations Research Society of Japan, 2011:25--45.
  • 3Hohzaki R. Mutual supervision in preshipment inspection programs. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006 ;01680:1-10.
  • 4Hohzaki R. An inspection game with multiple inspectees. European Journal of Operational Research,2007 : 894--906.
  • 5Sakaguchi M. A sequential game of multi-opportunity infiltration. Mathematica Janonica, 1994 ;39 : 157-166.
  • 6郑士源.合作博弈理论的研究进展——联盟的形成机制及稳定性研究综述[J].上海海事大学学报,2011,32(4):53-59. 被引量:23
  • 7戴云徽.出入境检验检疫符合性条件的筛选、检验策划及风险预警研究.南京:南京理工大学,2008:48-165.
  • 8樊博.检验检疫业务流程再造研究.上海:上海交通大学,2013.
  • 9施亚能.基于多Agent食品安全政府监管模型与仿真.武汉:武汉理工大学,2011.
  • 10陈咸奖,冯小影.基于博弈视角的食品安全监管研究[J].安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,29(1):24-26. 被引量:2

二级参考文献38

  • 1BRANZEI R, DIMITROV D, TIJS S. Models in cooperative game theory: crisp, fuzzy and muhichoice games[ M]. Springer, New York: 2005.
  • 2PELEG B, SUDHOLTER P. Introduction to the theory of cooperative games[ M]. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2007.
  • 3NASH J. The bargaining game[J]. Econometrica, 1950, 18(2) : 155-162.
  • 4RUBINSTEIN A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50( 1 ) : 97-110.
  • 5ROTH A. Handbook of experimental economics[ M]. Princeton NJ: Princeton Univ Pr, 1995.
  • 6HARSANYI J, SELTEN R. A generalized solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information[ J]. Manage Sci, 1972, 18 (5) : 80-106.
  • 7KIHLSTROM R, ROTH A, SCHMEIDLER D. Risk aversion and Nash' s solution to the bargaining problem [ P]. North Holland, Amsterdam: Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, 1981 : 5-71.
  • 8ROTH A. Axiomatic models in bargaining[M]. Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
  • 9MUTHOO A. A bargaining model based on the commitment tactic[J]. J Economy Theory, 1996, 69(2) : 134-152.
  • 10NOE T, WANG J. Strategic debt restructuring[J]. Rev Financial Study, 2000, 13(4) : 985-1015.

共引文献23

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部