期刊文献+

美国构建彩票公信力的措施及其借鉴 被引量:4

Ensuring Integrity of Chinese Lotteries: What Should We Learn From USA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国彩票的公信力久为社会所诟病,多数论者认为根本症结在于彩票经营与监督合一的体制,即政府机构直接经营彩票并自我监督。然而,美国等发达国家与我国采取同样的体制,其彩票信誉却并未受损。事实上,奉行市场经济的美国之所以选择政府机构直接经营彩票的机制,目的之一正是为了防止彩票弊案的发生。这至少说明经营与监督合一的体制本身不是导致彩票弊案的主要因素。与美国相比较,我国彩票的真正不足在于法律制度的粗疏以及执行方面的随意性。保证我国彩票公信力的正确方向是学习美国严密细致的法律制度,并采取措施落实,而不是把重点放在体制改革上。 The Chinese lottery' s lack of integrity has long been criticized in that several cheating cases have happened since it was started in 1987. Most commentators believe that no separate and independent check-and-balance system for Chinese lotteries is the real problem. Their opinion is not convincing as the experience of the Western countries such as the United States, where the same system with ours has been taken, suggests that the integrity of lotteries has little to do with separate check-and-balance system. In practice, the United States protects the integrity of lotteries through comprehensive procedures regarding the operations and security of its games. The real major problems of Chinese lotteries embed mainly in ineffective laws and regulations and loose enforcement. The right direction to ensure the integrity of Chinese lotteries, therefore, is to make careful and meticulous regulations and to enforce them strictly, rather than to overhaul the entire system.
作者 王长斌
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2014年第4期82-88,共7页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 彩票信誉 美国彩票 彩票法律制度 彩票监管 the integrity of lotteries lotteries in the United States lottery laws lottery regulations
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1许力攀,刘文涛.彩票监管机制研究[J].中国行政管理,2004(12):41-45. 被引量:14
  • 2张玉超.我国彩票法律制度研究[J].首都体育学院学报,2011,23(1):17-21. 被引量:5
  • 3朱新力,唐明良.政府对彩票业的法律规制——问题、成因及和谐社会理念下的制度面应对[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,36(2):139-148. 被引量:16
  • 4Douglas, Andrew. The National Lottery and Its Regulation: Process, Problems and Personalities [ M]. New York: Continuum, 2001.
  • 5Rose, I. Nelson. The Rise and Fail of the Third Wave : Gambling Will be Outlawed in Forty Years [ A ]. Eadington & Cornelius. Gambling and Public Policy [ C ]. Reno: Institute for the Study of Gambling, 1991, 65 - 86.
  • 6Dunstan, Roger. Gambling in California [ M ]. California Research Bureau, California State Library, 1997, CRB - 97 - 003.
  • 7Grote, Kent & Matheson, Victor. Should Gambling Markets be Privatized? An Examination of State Lotteries in the United States (2013). Economics Department Working Papers. Paper 2. http://crossworks, holycross edu/econ working_papers/2.
  • 8Durham, Steve & Hashimoto, Kathryn. The History of Gambling in America [ M]. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010, 5 -37.
  • 9Eadington ,William R. The Legalization of Casinos: Policy Objectives, Regulatory Alternative and Cost/Benefit Considerations [J]. Journal of Travel Research, 1996, 34(3 ) : 3 - 8.
  • 10Herrmann, Denise von. The Big Gamble: The Politics of Lottery and Casino Expansion [M]. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2002, p72.

二级参考文献34

共引文献32

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部