期刊文献+

盆腔肿瘤图像引导放疗计划靶区外放的研究 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用锥型束CT(CBCT)研究盆腔肿瘤的摆位误差,并探讨计划靶区边界(MPTV)。方法:对13例盆腔肿瘤患者,每次照射前行锥形束CT扫描(CBCT),将获取的CBCT图像和计划CT图像进行匹配,获得左右(x)、头脚(y)、腹背(z)3个方向的摆位误差,在线校正误差后治疗。治疗后再次行CBCT扫描,分析治疗前后的误差数据并计算MPTV。结果:校正前摆位误差在x、y、z轴分别为(0.4±1.3)、(-0.2±3.4)、(-1.7±1.7)mm,MPTV分别为5.4、12.1、7.0 mm;校正后误差分别为(0.1±0.7)、(-0.1±1.4)、(-0.3±1.0)mm,MPTV分别为2.2、3.1、2.7 mm。结论:盆腔肿瘤放疗时建议x、y、z轴MPTV分别为8、15、10 mm,使用CBCT引导可使MPTV缩小至4 mm。
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第17期2807-2808,共2页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Stroom JC, Hejmen B1. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins ,and the ICRU-62 report [lJ. Radiother Oncol, 2002,64(1):75-83.
  • 2Remeijer P, Geerlof E, Ploeger L, et al. 3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evalution of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2000,46(5): 1281-1290.
  • 3Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2002,52(5): 1407-1422.
  • 4Yu Y, Michaud AL, Sreeraman R, et al. Comparison of daily versus nondaily image-guided radiotherapy protocols for patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J]. Head Neck, 2014,36(7) :992-997.
  • 5Langsenlehner T, Doller C, Winkler P, et al. Impact of interand intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins [J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2013,189(4) :321-328.
  • 6Ling CC, Yorke E, Fuks Z. From IMRT to IGRT: frontierland or Neverland? [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2006,78 (2) : 119-122.
  • 7漆辉雄,杜珂,孙秋实,李泉.调强放疗同步化疗联合热疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的临床观察[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(17):2928-2929. 被引量:37
  • 8吴君心,谢志原,林育毅,瞿宜艳,邵凌东,孔祥泉,郭爱华,潘建基.应用锥形束CT对盆腔肿瘤放疗计划靶区外放距离的研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010,19(4):328-330. 被引量:22
  • 9李炯雁,郭小毛,姚伟强,王艳阳,马金利,陈佳艺,章真,冯炎.在线千伏级锥形束CT引导前列腺癌调强放疗摆位误差研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010(6):541-543. 被引量:8

二级参考文献22

  • 1戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 2刘跃平,刘新帆,李晔雄,李涛.盆腔肿瘤三维适形放疗摆位重复性研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):313-316. 被引量:44
  • 3van Herk M.Errors and Margins in Radiotherapy.Semin Radiat Onco1,2004,14:52-64.
  • 4McKenzie A,van Herk M,Mijnheer B.Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol,2002,62:99-307.
  • 5Van Herk M,Remeijer P,Lebesque JV.Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52:1407-1422.
  • 6Baiter JM,Chen GT,Pelizzari CA,et al.Online repositioning during treatment of the prostate:a study of potential limits and gains.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993,27:137-143.
  • 7Hunt M.The effect of positional uncertainties on the treatment of primary nasopharynx cancer.Med Phys,1989,16:456-464.
  • 8Stroom JC,Heijmen BJ.Geometrical uncertainties,radiotherapy planning margins,and the ICRU-62 report.Radiother Oncol,2002,64:75 -83.
  • 9Letoumeau D,Wong JW,Oldham M,et al.Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy:technical implementation.Radiother Oncol,2005,75:279 -286.
  • 10Stroom.JC,de Boer HCJ,Huizinga H,et al.Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,43:905-919.

共引文献62

同被引文献44

引证文献7

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部