对凯尔森之纯粹法理论的反向探讨

The Reverse Study of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law

传统法哲学领域中存在着两大理论类型,即自然法理论和经验法律实证主义理论。长久以来,不少人以为这两大理论非但互相排斥,更共同穷尽了法律理论的一切可能。若承认这两大传统理论类型并且认为其穷尽一切可能并排除其它理论类型,将会产生法学上二律背反问题。凯尔森通过引入法律与事实关系的命题解决了这一难题,并提出了自己的纯粹法理论。但是,凯尔森并没有论证纯粹法理论的对立面存在的可能性。通过对凯尔森的纯粹法理论的反向探讨,问题的实质将会转向道德与事实的关系上。对道德与事实关系的论述,将直接关系到法律的合法性与有效性问题。

There are two types of theories in traditional philosophy of law, the theory of natural law and the theory of legal positivism experience. For a long time, many people think that they not only repel each other, but have exhausted all possible legal theories. Therefore, an antinomy arises if the notion is taken for granted. Kelsen, by introducing the proposition of the relationship of law and truth solves this problem and puts forward the pure theory of law itself. However, Kelsen does not demonstrate the opposite possibility of the pure theory of law. From the reverse discussion of Kelson＇ s pure theory of law, the essence of the issue turns to the relationship of morality and truth. The analysis of morality and truth shall be directly related to the legitimacy and effectiveness of law.