期刊文献+

基于结构可靠度理论的溃口范围确定方法研究

Dam-breach range determination based on structural reliability theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前水工设计中常用的单个单元点的安全系数很难表征工程结构整体的安全性,更不利于判断具有贯穿性破坏特点的溃口问题。对此,提出了选取贯穿大坝上下游面且距离最短的所有单元组成一个单元组,并用概率理论分析大坝整体溃口失效与单元组的串并联关系,进而提出了用可靠度定量确定溃口范围的新方法。据此对某碾压混凝土双曲拱坝进行了计算分析,结果表明该计算方法科学、可行,由失效概率确定的溃口范围比传统点安全系数的表达更直观、客观。 The safety coefficient of single element normally used in hydraulic engineering design is difficult to representing the overall structure safety, especially unqualified to analyze the penetrative dam-breach problem. A reliability theory to determine dam-breach range is proposed, in this method,the single element that penetrates dam body with the nearest distance is incorpo-rated into an element group;furthermore, the series-parallel relation between dam-break overall failure and the element group is analyzed by probability theory. The proposed method is applied to a roller concrete arch dam, the results show that the presen-ted method has advantages of rationality and applicability and its dam-breach range is more intuitive and objective to traditional point safety coefficient method.
出处 《人民长江》 北大核心 2014年第16期37-41,55,共6页 Yangtze River
基金 长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(CKWV2013216/KY) 南京水利科学研究院水利部水科学与水工程重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(YK914008) 湖北省水利重点科研课题(EK110469)
关键词 ANSYS 结构可靠度 失效概率 溃口范围 溃坝洪水 ANSYS structural reliability failure probability dam-breach range dam-break flood
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1方崇惠,韩翔,段亚辉,袁俊光,方波青.混凝土拱坝溃口范围定量判定[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2010,43(6):689-693. 被引量:2
  • 2谢任之.溃坝水力学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1990..
  • 3Christopher R. Goodell. P. E. Dam Break Modeling for Tandem Reser- voirs - a Case Study using HEC - RAS and HEC - HMS[ J]. Environ- mental & Water Resources Institute of ASCE, 2005.
  • 4方崇惠,段亚辉.溃坝事件统计分析及其警示[J].人民长江,2010,41(11):96-101. 被引量:19
  • 5朱伯芳 高季章 陈祖煜.拱坝设计与研究[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003..
  • 6SL203-97水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
  • 7GBl8306-2001中国地震动参数区划图[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001.

二级参考文献14

  • 1王道席.水库安全设计与垮坝风险[J].水利水电科技进展,1995,15(1):17-24. 被引量:16
  • 2SL282-2003.混凝土拱坝设计规范[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
  • 3ICOLD. Lessons from dam incidents [ R ]. Paris : [ s. n. ] , 1973.
  • 41COLD. Deterioration of Dams and Reservoirs[ R ]. Paris: [ s. n. ], 1983.
  • 5ICOLD. Statistical Analysis of Dam Failures[ R]. Paris: [ s. n. ], 1995.
  • 6U. S, Commission On Large Dam ( USCOLD). Committee on Failures and Accidents to Large Dams: Lessons from dam incidents[ R]. New York: [ s. n. ] ,1975.
  • 7U. S,Commission On Large Dam ( USCOLD). Committee on Failures and Accidents to Large Dams: Lessons from dam incidents Ⅱ [ R]. New York: [ s. n. ] ,1988.
  • 8CHENG S T. Statistics on dam failures [ C ]//Reliablility and uncertaint analises in hydraulic design. New York:[ s. n. ] , 1993.
  • 9Tatalovich J, Harris D. Comparison of Failure Mode from Risk Assessment and Historical Data for Bureau of Reclamation Dams [ R ]. Denver: Bureau of Reclamation, 1998.
  • 10Christopher R,Goodell P E. Dam break modeling for tandem reservoirs a case study using HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS[J]. Environmental & Water Resources Institute of ASCE, 2005, http://www, ascelibrary, org/.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部