期刊文献+

腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床探讨 被引量:3

Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder stones combined choledochoscope biliary stones
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效。方法将120例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的患者根据治疗方法的不同分为观察组70例和对照组50例,观察组接受腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗,对照组采用常规开腹手术治疗。观察比较两组患者手术情况、疗效及术后并发症发生情况。结果两组患者经治疗后,结石清除率均为100%。但观察组术中出血量、术后排气时间、下床时间以及总住院时间均低于对照组( t=6.655、6.386、4.657、7.675,均P<0.05)。观察组患者术后并发症发生率8.6%(6/70)明显低于对照组的30.0%(15/50)(χ2=9.276,P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,有手术创伤小、恢复快等优点,疗效确切,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the effect of Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder stones combined choledochoscope biliary stones .Methods 120 patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones were divided into the observation group and control group according to different treatments methods ,who were treated with laparoscopy combined choledochoscope therapy and conventional open surgery respectively .Basic surgical,the efficacy and the occurrence of postoperative complications of the two groups were compared .Results The stone clearance rates of the two groups were 100%.However,the surgical trauma,blood loss,postoperative discharge time ,bed time and the total length of hospital stay of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ( t=6.655, 6.386,4.657,7.675,all P〈0.05).The incidence of complications of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (8.6% vs 30.0%,χ2 =9.276,P〈0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery com-bined treatment method choledochoscope with less trauma ,quicker recovery advantages of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones have a definite therapeutic effect ,which should be widely applied .
作者 杨志鹏
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2014年第17期2629-2631,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 胆囊结石病 胆总管结石 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 Cholecystolithiasis Choledocholithiasis Cholecystectomy,Laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献123

共引文献358

同被引文献28

  • 1宁纯民.纤维胆道镜取石480例临床分析[J].中国基层医药,2007,14(7):1107-1108. 被引量:3
  • 2Kummerow KL,Shelton C, Philllips S,et al. Predictingcomplicated choledocholithiasis[J]. J Surg Res,2012,177(1):70-74.
  • 3Joshi RM,Shetty TS, Adhikari DR,et al. Choledocholithi-* asis : endotherapy versus surgery [J], Int Surg, 2010, 92(2):95-99.
  • 4Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective random-ized trial of LC ~h LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for commonbile duct stone disease [ J]. Arch Surg, 2010 , 145 ( 1 );28-33.
  • 5Yachimski P, Poulose BK. ERCP vs laparoscopic commonbile duct exploration for common bile stones : are the tech-niques truly equivalent^J]. Arch Surg,2010,145(8) :795.
  • 6Vapenstad C, Rethy A, Lang T, et al. Laparoseopic ultrasound : a survey of its current and future use, requirements, and integration with navigation technology. Surg Endosc, 2010,24 : 2944-2953.
  • 7Vitek, L&MC. Carey. New pathophysiological concepts underlying pathogenesis of pigment gallstones [ J]. Clinics and Research in Hepatoloty and Gastroenterology ,2012, ( 36 ) : 122-129.
  • 8Carlline & Tracey. Hepatic artery pseudoneurysm following laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. The American Journal of Surgery, 2010, (188) : 10-11.
  • 9Harboe KM, Bardram L. Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy :results from a national database [ J ]. lnt J Qual Health Care ,2011,23 (5) :565-573.
  • 10Festi D, Reggiani ML, Attili AF, et al. Natural history of gallstone disease : Expectant management or active treatment Results from a population-hased cohort study[ J ]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2010, 25(4) :719-724.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部