期刊文献+

软性输尿管镜碎石术中肾盂内压力监测方法及意义 被引量:61

Monitoring of renal pelvic pressure and its siginifcance during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨软性输尿管镜碎石术中肾盂内压变化及其对术后并发症的影响.方法 总结2012年3月至2013年5月60例软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中肾盂内压变化及术后患者血清降钙素和内毒素数据,分析肾盂内压力变化与术后并发症之间的关系.肾盂内压力监测采用双腔(主通道和副通道)软性输尿管镜送达鞘,副通道内置4F输尿管导管连接测压系统,平均灌注流量30 ml/min,平均灌注压30 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),每2 s采集一次数据,数据实时导入计算机并作统计学分析.以肾盂压力最高值(IPPmax)和IPPmax累计时间的不同,将患者分为正常压力组(IPPmax≤30 mmHg)、压力升高组(IPPmax >30 mmHg但累计时间≤10 min)、反流压力组(IPPmax >30 mmHg但累计时间> 10 min)共3组.结果 术中肾盂内压力初始值(IPP0)为(13.2±5.6) mmHg,IPPmax为(95.6±2.3) mmHg,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000).60例中正常压力组32例,压力升高组17例,反流压力组11例.本组术后发热6例(10%),其中正常压力组1例、压力升高组1例、反流压力组4例,各组术后发热发生率分别为3%、6%及36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).60例中12例(20%)降钙素>0.1 ng/ml,8例>0.5 ng/ml,其中压力升高组2例和反流压力组6例.结论 软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中存在肾盂内高压现象,术中肾盂内压力变化与灌注压力大小及灌注时间有关.患者术后发热风险与肾盂内压力及手术时间相关.应注意监控术中灌注压力. Objective To monitor the renal pelvic pressure and to investigate its clinical significance during retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RFUL).Methods The data of renal pelvic pressure measured in 60 cases of RFUL with the mean irrigation pump speed and pressure of 30 ml/min and 30 mmHg were analyzed retrospectively.The influence factors of renal pelvic pressure and its correlation with postoperative fever were analyzed.Renal pelvic pressure was measured by baroceptor,which was connected to PHILIP-MP4 monitor IBP channel and ureteric catheter positioned in renal pelvis through a dual channel ureteral access sheath (UAS).The renal pelvic pressure data was collected and analyzed in every 2 seconds by computer.The 60 cases were divided into 3 groups according to their intra-pelvic pressure situations:normal pressure group(NP,IPPmax ≤30 mmHg),high pressure group(HP,IPPmax>30 mmHg,but high pressure duration≤ 10 min),and backflow pressure group(BP,IPPmax>30 mmHg and high pressure duration> 10 min).Results The baseline intra-pelvic pressure (IPP0) and max imum intra-pelvic pressure (IPPmax) were (13.2±5.6) mmHg and (95.6±2.3) mmHg respectively.IPP levels during the RFUL were significantly higher than the IPP0(P<0.001).There were 32,17 and 11 cases in NP,HP and BP groups,respectively.There were 6 cases with fever higher than 38.5 ℃ (10%),in which there were 1 case in NP,1 case in HP group and 4 cases in BP group.The postoperative fever rate in NP,HP and BP group were 3%,6% and 36% respectively,which were significantly different between groups(P<0.01).There were 12 cases with procalcitonin >0.1 ng/ml and 8 cases with procalcitonin >0.5 ng/ml,in which 2 cases in HP group and 6 cases in BP group.Conclusions RFUL would result in a temporal elevated intrapelvic pressure greater than 30 mmHg.Postoperative fever is relevant with renal perfusion pressure and perfusion time.It's necessary for the surgeons to adjust the perfusion pressure during operation.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期575-578,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 软性输尿管镜 碎石术 肾盂内压力监测 感染 Flexible ureteroscope Lithotripsy Measurement of renal pelvic pressure Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Leavitt DA,Anderson JK,Elliott SP.Complications of ureteroscopy[M]//Monga M.Current clinical urology,ureteroscopy,indications,instrumentation & technique.German:Humana Press,2013:419-434.
  • 2Xu LW,Li GH.Life threatening subcapsular renal hematoma after flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy:treatment with superselective renal arterial embolization[J].Urolithoiasis,2013,41:449-451.
  • 3陈亮 许清泉 王晓峰等.经皮肾镜碎石术后全身炎症反应综合征的危险因素分析.中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(3):173-176.
  • 4Marcello C,Jose R,Colombo JR.Outcomes of flexible ureteroseopie lithotripsy with Holmium laser for upper urinary tract calculi[J].Int Braz J Urol,2008,34:143-150.
  • 5Razvan M,Bogdan G,Dragos G,et al.Conventional fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope versus fourth generation distal flexible ureteroscope:a critical comparison[J].J Endourol,2010,21:17-21.
  • 6Kreydin EI,Eisner BH.Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery[J].Nat Rev Urol,2013,10:598-605.
  • 7钟文,曾国华,杨后猛,桂志明,李逊,吴开俊.微创经皮肾镜取石术中肾盂内压变化对术后发热的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(10):668-671. 被引量:98
  • 8Holst U,Dissing T,Rawashdeh YF,et al.Norepinephrine inhibits the pelvic pressure increase in response to now perfusion[J].J Urol,2003,170:268-271.
  • 9Kukreja RA,Desai MR,Sabnis RB,et al.Fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotomy:does it matter?[J].J Endourol,2002,16:221-224.
  • 10Nguyen HT,Kogan BA.Renal hemodynamic changes after complete and papal unilateral ureteral obstruction in the fetal lamb[J].J Urol,1998,160:1063-1069.

二级参考文献28

  • 1曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.微创经皮肾穿刺取石术中肾盂内压变化的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(2):101-103. 被引量:155
  • 2Landman J, Venkatesh R, Ragab M, et al. Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath. Urology, 2002, 60: 584-587.
  • 3Troxel SA, Low RK. Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol, 2002, 168: 1348-1351.
  • 4Zeng GH, Zhong W, Li X, et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17: 307-310.
  • 5Shariei A, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, et at. Frequency of post percutaneous nephrolithotomy fever and its contributing factors. BJU Int, 2004, 94: 270-271.
  • 6Mariappan P, Loong CW. Mid stream urine C&S test is a poor predictor of infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteric stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study.J Urol, 2004, 171: 2142-2145.
  • 7Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy., prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol, 2002, 16: 649-653.
  • 8Bone RC,Balk RA,Cerra FB. ACCP/SCCM definitions for sepsis and organ failure guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J]. Chest, 1992,101:1644- 1655.
  • 9Joan M. The role of C reactive protein in the evaluation and management of infants with suspected sepsis[J].Adv Neonatal Care,2003,3(1):3 -13.
  • 10Povoa P, Almeida E, Moreira P,et al. C-reactive protein as an in dicator of sepsis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008, 24: 1052-1056.

共引文献531

同被引文献474

引证文献61

二级引证文献610

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部