期刊文献+

基于云模型的地震区公路震害风险评估 被引量:27

Cloud Model-based Seismic Risk Assessment of Road in Earthquake Region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用主成分分析与专家调查相结合的方法进行因子辨识,筛选出对公路沿线区域地震风险有显著影响的峰值加速度、植被覆盖率、地层岩性和地表坡度作为评价因子.引入云模型理论,改进传统层次分析法的不足,提出了基于云模型-层次分析法的地震区公路震害评估赋权方法.运用地理信息系统技术平台,研究了各风险因子的标度分值,建立了地震区公路震害风险评估模型并进行了实例分析.结果表明:实例工程震害风险指数在1.00~6.96之间,其中大部分区域震害风险指数处于5以下,路线起点南及东南为高峰值加速度、硬岩、大边坡坡度区域,震害风险指数接近7,风险评估计算结果与实际相符. The risk factors were discriminated according to its influence on seismic risk of highway based on the principal component analysis and expert surveys. Four factors such as the peak acceleration, vegetation coverage, formation lithology, slope, were selected as evaluation factors for their significant effect. Traditional analytic hierarchy process was improved by resorting to the cloud model, and a weight approach was proposed for seismic risk assessment based on cloud model- analytic hierarchy process. The scale scores of each risk factor was studied by using geographic information systems technology platform. The assessment model of seismic risk was set up, and the method was validated. The results indicate that the seismic risk index of the experiment area is 1.00-6.96. Seismic risk value of most regional is less than 5.00, the maximum value in the south and the southeastof the starting point with high peak acceleration, hard rock and large slop is close to 7. Risk assessment results agree well with the measured data.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期1352-1358,1458,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 西部交通建设科技项目(2009318000102) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(CHD2011ZD021)
关键词 道路工程 地震 风险评估 云模型 主成分分析法 层次分析法 road engineering earthquake risk assessmentcloud model principal component analysis analytic hierarchyprocess
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1贾兴利.高烈度地震峡谷区公路选线理论与方法研究[D].西安:长安大学,2013.
  • 2Wemer S D,Taylor E C,Cho S B.New developments in seismic risk analysis of highway systems[C]//the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Vancouver:University of Southern California,2004:2189-2194.
  • 3Mualchin L.Seismic hazard analysis for critical infrastructures in California[J].Engineering Geology,2005,79(3):177.
  • 4Buekle G G I,KIM S H.A vulnerability assessment modal for highway bridges[C]//The 4th US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering.New York:ASCE,1995:493-500.
  • 5Lupoi A,Franchin P,Schotanus M.Seismic risk evaluation of RC bridge structure[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2003,32(8):1275.
  • 6Crowley H,Bommer J.Modeling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure[J].Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2006(4):249.
  • 7冯清海,袁万城.基于IDA-MC的桥梁地震风险概率评估方法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2010,30(3):60-65. 被引量:15
  • 8钱保国,叶志明,陈玲俐,陈彤,许哲.生命线工程网络系统抗震可靠性分析方法综述[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(1):122-126. 被引量:14
  • 9孙璐,郁烨,顾文钧.基于PCA和HMM的汽车保有量预测方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2013,13(2):92-98. 被引量:16
  • 10Malhi A,Gao R X.PCA-based feature selection scheme formachine defect classification[J].Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2004,53(6):1517.

二级参考文献82

共引文献103

同被引文献278

引证文献27

二级引证文献199

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部