期刊文献+

“能”与“会”的主观性差异 被引量:1

Sujective Difference of "neng" and "hui"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从情态动词"能"和"会"的情态意义在主客观认知域上的对立倾向出发,考察二者在主观标记、言者主语和句子主语、条件的可否定与不可否定性、预设条件、自由形式和粘着形式等五个方面存在的主观性差异,得出"会"比"能"的主观性更强的观点。 From the opposite tendency of the modal meanings of modal verbs "neng" and "hui" in subjective and objective cognitive domain,this paper explores the subjective difference of the two on the aspects of subjective mark, speaker subject and sentence subject,negativity and non - negativity of conditions,presupposition,free form and bound form and then gets the viewpoint that the subjectivity of “hui” is stronger than that of “neng”.
作者 叶玉英
出处 《成都师范学院学报》 2014年第8期46-51,共6页 Journal of Chengdu Normal University
关键词 主观性 认知域 情态意义 subjectivity cognitive domain modal meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1沈家煊.“语用否定”考察[J].中国语文,1993,(5):321-331.
  • 2王维贤.《论转折句》[J].《中国语言学报》,1991,(4).
  • 3王伟1998.《“能”的个案:现代汉语情态研究的认知维度》,中国社会科学院研究生院语言系硕士论文.
  • 4Bybee, Joan,R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca 1994 The Evolution of Grammar - Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Ducrot, O. 1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
  • 6Grice, H.P. 1975 Logic and conversation. InCole, P&J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41 - 58.
  • 7Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Lyons, J. 1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Searle, John 1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Sweetser, Eve 1990 From Etymology to Pragrnatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献479

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部