期刊文献+

公众环境权与城市审美走向研究

Research of the Public Environmental Right and Urban Aesthetic Drientation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 环境权是在城市化过程中产生的新型权利,对其行使主体的差异影响着城市审美的最终走向。研究结果表明,性别和不同居住年限并非影响城市审美问题的关键因子;不同学历层次和不同职业的规律相似,在认为城市环境趋于合理的群体中,"硕士及以上"学历和"私企业主"所占的比例最低(P<0.05);认为城市环境趋于恶化的人群中,高收入人群要显著高于低收入人群。城市审美的发展,需要综合考虑不同年龄、不同学历、不同职业以及不同收入间的主体差异,建立公众环境权制度。 Environmental right is a new right generated during the process of urbanization.However,different subjects exercising sucha right may affect the ultimate urban aesthetic orientation differendy.The results show that more than 70% of the publichave no knowledge of low-carbon economy required for industrial parks.The public still expect the companies to achieve the environmental targets in a better way by utilization of policy incentives or economic leverage."Gender" and "residence years" are not the critical factors affecting urban aesthetic.Different education levels and different occupations show a similar trend.Among all the groups who think the urban environment tends to get reasonable,people with "master degree or above" or being "private-owners" share the lowest percentage.Among all the groups who consider the urban environment tends to get worse,people with higher income share more percentage than those with lower income significantly.Therefore,with regard to the urban aesthetic development,the main differences in ages,educations,occupations and incomes should be taken into an integrated consideration and a system of public environmental right should be established.In this way,eco-city will be developed in a harmonious way.
出处 《环境保护科学》 CAS 2014年第4期86-90,共5页 Environmental Protection Science
基金 环保公益性行业科研专项基金(201309039)资助
关键词 环境权 低碳经济 职业选择 审美主体 Environmental Right Low-carbon Economy Occupation Choice Aesthetic Subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1刘继勇,张轶歆.试析环境权的人权属性及法律保护[J].检察实践,2005(2):72-74. 被引量:2
  • 2高素.论环境权的性质与主体[J].法制与社会,2007(2):49-51. 被引量:2
  • 3Lofsten H, Lindelof P. Science parks in Sweden - Industrial renewal and development? [ J]. R&D Management, 2001, 21 (1) : 45 -57.
  • 4Bengtsson L, Lowegren M. Internationalisation in Science Parks - The Case of Finland and Sweden [ C ] , Paper presented at the 2001 Swedish Network for European Studies in Economics and Business Conference in Molle, Sweden, 2001, May : 14 - 16.
  • 5Amirahmadi H, Saff G. Science Parks: A critical Assessment [ J ]. Journal of Planning Literature, 1993, 8 ( 2 ) : 107 - 123.
  • 6Ferguson, Olofsson. Science Parks and the Location of NTBFs A Survey [ C ]. Working Paper, Uppsala:CEF, 1998.
  • 7Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Fortune favors the prepared firm [J]. Management Science, 19941 40:227-251.
  • 8Baum J A C, Haveman H A. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898 - 1990 [ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42:304-338.
  • 9Furman J L. Location and organizing strategy: exploring the influence of location on the organization of pharmaceutical research [ J ]. Advances in Strategic Management, 2003, 20 : 49 - 88.
  • 10Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A. Old economy inputs for ' new economy' outcomes: cluster formation in the new silicon valleys [ J ]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001 ,10:835 -860.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部