摘要
目的:考察国产辛伐他汀片与原研制剂的的人体生物利用度,评价两制剂在健康人体的生物等效性.方法:18名健康成年男性志愿者采用随机自身交叉对照试验设计,单剂量口服辛伐他汀片40 mg,用LC-MS/MS法测定血浆中辛伐他汀浓度,采用DAS 3.2.2程序拟合药动学参数,并进行生物等效性评价.结果:单剂量口服40 mg辛伐他汀试验制剂(国产)和参比制剂后,两药的主要药动学参数分别为tmax(4.54±5.35)和(2.32±1.72) h;Cmax:(5.63±4.03)和(7.29±3.84) ng·ml-1;t1/2:(6.31±4.99)和(4.67±3.07) h;AUC(0-t):(38.75 ±29.55)和(35.54±30.12)ng·h·ml-1;AUC(∞):(67.31±60.25)和(40.36±34.78)ng·h·ml-1.试验制剂与参比制剂比较,相对生物利用度为117.2%.受试制剂的AUC0→t 90%可信限为89.5%~ 153.5%,AUC0→ 90%可信限为118.1%~198.7%,落在参比制剂对应参数80% ~ 125%范围外.结论:两制剂的吸收程度有差异,不等效.
Objective: To study the relative bioavailability of domestic simvastatin tablets (test tablets) compared with the innova- tor preparation ( reference tablets) in Chinese healthy volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two products. Methods : A single oral dose of 40 mg simvastation test tablets and reference tablets was given to 18 healthy volunteers in a randomized crossover study. The plasma concentration of simvastation was determined by LC-MS/MS. DAS 3.2.2 software was used tO calculate the pharmacokinet- ic parameters and evaluate the bioequivalence. Results : After the oral administration, the major pharmacokinetic parameters of test tab- lets and reference tablets were as follows: t were (4.54 ±5.35) and (2.32 ± 1.72) h; Cmax were (5.63 ±4.03) and (7.29 ± 3.84) ng·ml-1;tv2 were (6.31 ±4.99) and (4.67 ±3.07) h;AUC(0-1):(38.75±29.55) and (35.54 ±30.12)ng· h · ml-1; AUC(0-∞) were (67.31 ±60.25) and (40.36 ±34.78)ng · h · ml -1. The 90 % confidence interval ofAUC0→t was 89.5%-153.5% and AUC0→∞ was 118.1% -198.7% , both were beyond the standard of reference tablets (80%-125% ). Conclusion: There is differ- ence in the relative bioavailability of the two tablets, and they are not bioequivalent.
出处
《中国药师》
CAS
2014年第8期1288-1291,共4页
China Pharmacist