期刊文献+

基于体素灰度三维多模医学图像配准中相似性测度的选取(英文) 被引量:4

Choice of Similarity Measure in Voxel Intensity Based 3D Multi-modal Medical Image Registration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的在基于体素灰度医学图像配准领域 ,找出最适合于临床应用的多模医学图像配准相似性测度。方法在极端的刚体配准条件下 ,检验出互相关系数 ,互信息和相关比相似性测度为适合的相似性测度。同时进一步解释了基于互信息相似性测度的医学图像配准易于陷入局部最优 ,而基于相关比相似性测度的方法易于保证配准得到全局最优。最后 ,利用加速的多分辨率配准方案和Powell′s优化算法 ,对临床医学图像进行了基于相关比相似性测度的多模图像配准试验。结果通过临床医学专家的判断 ,利用相关比相似性测度进行多模医学图像配准 ,完全能满足临床的要求 ,进行MR/CT、MR/PET三维多模医学图像配准时效果非常理想。结论相比于其他相似性测度 ,互相关比相似性测度在基于体素灰度 ,三维多模医学图像配准领域 。 Objective To find out the most appropriate similarity measure for clinical use by comparison research on similarity measures commonly used in voxel intensity based multi modal medical image registration. Method Under extreme rigid registration condition, correlation coefficient,mutual information and correlation ratio similarity measures were tested as most suitable similarity measures. It was explained why mutual information, but not correlation ratio based medical image registration be easily trapped in the local optimization maximum. At last, using accelerated multi resolution registration scheme and powell′s optimization algorithm, experiments based on clinical medical images were implemented to evaluate the correlation ratio similarity measure for multi modal medical image registration. Result Judged by clinical expert,correlation ratio based multi modal medical image registration method worked well for clinical application, the effect of correlation ratio based, 3D MR/CT and MR/PET, multi modal medical image registration was promising for clinical use. Conclusion Compared with other similarity measures, correlation ratio is more appropriate and accurate for 3D multi modal medical image registration.
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第4期241-245,共5页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
基金 Foundationitem :SupportedbyShanghaiScienceDevelopnentFund(985 10 70 16)
关键词 体素灰度 三维多模医学图像 配准 相似性测试 互信息 多分辨率 multi modal medical image registration similarity measure voxel intensity correlation ratio mutual information multi resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Maintz JBA,Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration[J]. Medical Image Analysis,1998, 2(1):1-36.
  • 2[2]Hsu LY, Loew MH. Fully automatic 3D feature-based registration of multi-modality medical images[J]. Image and Vision Computing,2001, 19(1):75-85.
  • 3[3]Audette Michel A, Ferrie Frank P,Peter Terry M. An algorithm overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging[J]. Medical Image Analysis,2000, 4(3):201-217.
  • 4[4]West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography,1997, 21(4): 554-566.
  • 5[5]Viola P,Wells W.Alignment by maximization of Mutual Information[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, 24(2):137-154.
  • 6[6]Pluim JPW. Mutual information based registration of medical images[D]. PhD thesis, Image Sciences Institute at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.
  • 7[7]Roche A, Malandain G, Pennec X,et al. Multi-modal image registration by maximization of the correlation ratio[R]. Technical Report 3378,INRIA, 1999.
  • 8[8]Woods RP, Mazziotta JC, Cherry SR. MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm[J]. J Comp Assist Tomogr,1993, 17(3):536-546.
  • 9[9]Studholme C, Hill D, Hawkes D.Automated 3-D registration of MR and CT images of the head[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 1996, 1(2):163-175.
  • 10[10]Jenkinson M,Smith S.A global optimization method for robust affine registration of brain images [J]. Medical Image Analysis,2001, 5(2): 143-156.

同被引文献52

  • 1Sjostrand K, Hansen M S, Larsson H B, et al. A path algorithm for the support vector domain description and its application to medical imaging. Medical Image Analysis 2007; 11(5): 417-428.
  • 2Jordi M M, Lorenzo B, Valls C G. A support vector domain description approach to supervised classi-fication of remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2007; 45(8): 2683- 2692.
  • 3Lee S W, Park J, Lee S W. Low resolution face recognition based on support vector data description. Pattern Recognition 2006; 39(9): 1809-1812.
  • 4Liu Y H, Lin S H, Hsueh Y L, et al. Automatic target defect identification for TFT-LCD array process inspection using kernel FCM-based fuzzy SVDD ensemble. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36(2): 1978-1998.
  • 5Bu H G, Wang J, Huang X B. Fabric defect detection based on multiple fractal features and support vector data description. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2009; 22(2): 224-235.
  • 6Zbang Y, Wei X Y, Jiang H F. One-class classifier based on SBT for analog circuit fault diagnosis. Measurement 2008; 41(4): 371-380.
  • 7Zhu M L, Chen S F, Eiu X D. Sphere-structured support vector machines for multi-class pattern recognition. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. 2003; 2639: 589-593.
  • 8Lee D, Lee J. Domain described support vector classifier for multi-classification problems. Pattern Recognition 2007; 40(1): 41-51.
  • 9Zhang Y, Chi Z X, Li K Q. Fuzzy multi-class classifier based on support vector data description and improved PCM. Expert Systems with Applications 2009: 36(5): 8714-8718.
  • 10Gau W L, Buehrer D J. Vague sets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1993; 23(2): 610- 614.

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部