期刊文献+

基于驾乘舒适性的沥青混凝土路面评价 被引量:5

Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Pavement Based on Passenger Ride Comfort Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为给沥青混凝土路面舒适性评价及日常管理养护提供理论依据,在测得室内外大量道路路面性能参数及三向加速度数据的基础上,研究了加权加速度均方根值与道路路面性能参数之间的关系.运用214组有效室外实验数据,拟合了加权加速度均方根、行驶速度与平整度关系的线性回归方程,并用驾驶模拟舱对室外实验结论进行了验证.结果表明:加权加速度均方根与平整度强相关,与速度中等程度相关,与动态摩擦系数弱相关,在动态摩擦系数一定的条件下,驾乘舒适性随平整度及行驶速度的增加而降低;当平整度为1.35和3.05 mm/m时,满足驾乘舒适性的最大速度分别为124.1和88.7 km/h. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the ride comfort level evaluation, daily management,and maintenance of asphalt concrete pavement,the performance parameters and three-directional acceleration data of highway pavements were measured indoors and outdoors. Using these data,the relationship between the mean square of weighted acceleration and the pavement performance was studied. A linear regression equation that reflects the relationship between the root mean square of weighed acceleration,speed,and roughness was obtained by fitting 214 groups of experimental data. In addition,the outdoor experimental results were verified using a driving simulator. The results show that the root mean square of weighed acceleration is strongly correlated with roughness,moderately correlated with the speed,and weakly correlated with the dynamic friction coefficient. Given a certain dynamic friction coefficient,the ride comfort level of an asphalt concrete pavement reduces with its roughness and driving speed increasing. When the roughness is 1. 35 and 3. 05 mm/m,the maximum speed with an appropriate ride comfort level is 124. 1 and 88. 7 km/h,respectively.
作者 王锋 张金喜
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期687-692,共6页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20091103110008)
关键词 沥青混凝土路面 驾乘舒适性 加权加速度均方根 最大行驶速度 舒适性评价 asphalt concrete pavement riding comfort mean square of weighed acceleration maximum driving speed comfort evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1王钧利,马春燕.汽车乘客振动舒适性评价指标的研究[J].工程力学,1998,15(A03):231-235. 被引量:4
  • 2中国工程建设标准化协会公路工程委员会.JTGB01-2003公路工程技术标准[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
  • 3HOU K, KALOUSEK J, DONG R. A dynamic model for an asymmetrical vehicle/track system[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 267(3): 591-604.
  • 4SOLIMAN A M A, KALDAS M M S, ABDALLAH S A. Influence of road roughness on the ride and rolling resistance for passenger car[C]//SAE 2013 World Congress and Exhibition. Detroit: SAE International, 2013.
  • 5ZHANG Hongliang, YANG Wanqiao. Evaluation method of pavement roughness based on human-vehicle-road interaction[C]//The 10th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals. Beijing: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010: 3541-3551.
  • 6PAN Xiaodong, YU Lijia, GUO Wei. Research on influence factors and evaluation of ride comfort of bridge bump based on road test[C]//2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering and Building Materials. Hong Kong: CRC Press/Balkema, 2012: 577-580.
  • 7CANTISANI G, LOPRENCIPE G. Road roughness and whole body vibration: evaluation tools and comfort limits[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010, 136(9): 818-826.
  • 8MIN Quan, ZHOU Ying. Method of traffic safety evaluation of newly designed highway based on driving simulation[C]//The 2nd International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety. Wuhan: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013: 244-251.
  • 9北京理工大学,北京航天医学工程研究所,中国铁道科学研究院,等. ISO2631-1:1997 机械振动与冲击,人体暴露于全身振动的评价,第1部分:一般要求[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
  • 10VINCENT R, MICHAEL S A, BRUSCELLA B. Simulation of road surface profiles[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(3): 247-253.

二级参考文献2

  • 1公路路面乘坐舒适性研究报告.GJ9305-3.西安公路学院.1993.
  • 2M.米奇克著.汽车动力学B卷(第二版).陈荫三译.北京:人民交通出版社,1994.

共引文献5

同被引文献25

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部