期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

“金三角”的断裂与重建——查莫斯型二维语义学的批判性考察 被引量：4

The Severance and Restoration of Golden Triangle——A Critical Study of Chalmers' Two-Dimensional Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 所谓意义、理性与模态的"金三角",指的是现代西方语言哲学与逻辑哲学的一种传统观点:一个语句是分析真的,当且仅当它是先验真的,当且仅当它是必然真的。查莫斯认为,20世纪70年代克里普克提出的形而上模态与认知模态的区分造成了传统"金三角"的断裂,而他试图利用"认知二维语义学"重建"金三角",同时使之与克里普克的理论相协调。然而,关于"认知二维语义学"是否真正地继承了形而上模态与认知模态的克里普克式区分这一点是有待讨论的。 The ＂golden triangle＂ of meaning, reason and modality denotes a traditional philosophical view in modern westem philosophy of language and philosophy of logic ： a sentence is analytical truth iff it is a priori truth iff it is necessary truth. David Chalmers believes that Kripke severed the traditional ＂golden triangle＂ at 70s last century, by distinguishing metaphysical modality from episternic modality, therefore, he attempts to use ＂epistemie two -di- mensional semantics＂ to restore the ＂golden triangle＂ and coordinate this semantical theory with Kripke＇ s theory at the same time. However, it may still be debatable whether ＂epistemie two - dimensional semantics＂ holds the distinguishment between metaphysical modality between epistemic modality made by Kripke or not.
作者 陈吉胜
机构地区 华中师范大学马克思主义学院
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期27-32,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 “金三角” 认知二维语义学 认知模态 形而上模态 ＂golden triangle＂ epistemie two- dimensional semantics epistemic modality metaphysical modality
分类号 N031 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Chalmers,D.The Conscious Mind[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1996.
  • 2Chalmers,D.“The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics”[C]//Manuel Garcia-Carpintero and Josep Macia(eds.),Two-Dimensional Semantics:Foundations and Applications,New York:Oxford University Press,2006,pp.55-140.
  • 3Frege,G.“On sense and Nominatum”[C]//A.P.Martinich(ed.),The Philosophy of Language,New York:Oxford University Press,1996,pp.186-198.
  • 4Carnap,R.Meaning and Necessity[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1947.
  • 5[德]康德.纯粹理性批判·导言[M].邓晓芒,译.北京:人民出版社,2004.
  • 6Kripke,S.Naming and necessity[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1980.
  • 7Stalnaker,R.“Assertion”[C].//Stalnaker,R.Context and Content,New York:Oxford University Press,1999,pp.78-95.
  • 8Evans,G.“Reference and Contingency”[J].Monist,Vol.62,1979,pp.161-189.
  • 9Davies,M.and Humberstone,L.“Two Notions of Necessity”[J].Philosophical Studies,Vol.58,1981,pp.1-30.
  • 10Jackson,F.From Metaphysics to Ethics:A Defense of Conceptual Analysis[M].New York:Oxford University,1998.

同被引文献25

  • 1Chalmers, D. Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2004, 118:: 153-226.
  • 2Chalmers, D. On Sense and Intension [J]. Philosophical Per- spective, 2002, 16 : 135-182.
  • 3Chalmers, D. The Conscious Mind [M]. New York: Oxford U- niversity Press, 1996.
  • 4Chalmers, D. The Character of Consciousness [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • 5Lewis, D. Naming the Colours[J]. Australasian Journal of Phi- losophy, 1997, 75 : 325 -342.
  • 6Lewis, D. On the Plurality of Worlds [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd,1986.
  • 7Kripke, S. Naming and necessity [M]. Cambridge: Harvard U- niversity Press, 1980.
  • 8Putnam H. Is Water Necessarily H2O? [C]//Conant J. (ed.). Realism with Human Face Cambridge.Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press, Reprint, 1992:54-79.
  • 9Kripke, S. A Puzzle about Belief [C]//Kripke, S. Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers Volume I. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, 2011:125-161.
  • 10Soames, S. Reference and Description[M]. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton Universtiy Press, 2005.

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

自然辩证法研究
2014年 第9期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部