期刊文献+

5种抗菌药物对泌尿系统感染患者疗效的成本-效果分析 被引量:3

Cost-effectiveness Analysis for 5 kinds of Antibacterial Agents in Patients with Urinary Tract Infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析5种抗菌药物对泌尿系统感染疗效的成本-效果,促进临床合理用药,降低治疗费用。方法:收集2009年12月—2014年2月间赣州市立医院治疗391例泌尿系统感染患者,按照药物的不同治疗方案分为A、B、C、D、E共5组,即A组83例患者给予左氧氟沙星治疗,B组77例患者予加替沙星治疗,C组74例患者予依诺沙星治疗,D组81例患者予氟罗沙星治疗,E组76例患者予环丙沙星治疗;运用药物经济学分析方法评价5种抗菌药物治疗泌尿系统感染疗效的成本-效果。结果:用A、B、C、D、E5组治疗方案的有效率分别为91.57%,84.42%,78.38%,93.83%和61.84%;其细菌清除率分别为88.34%,81.02%,76.27%,90.87%和59.61%;五组疗效的成本-效果比(C/E)分别为2.76,3.51,2.49,5.06和1.21;增量成本-效果比(△C/△E)分别为4.36,7.75,5.62,12.89和7.21;5组治疗方案出现不良反应率分别为9.64%(8例),9.09%(7例),9.46%(7例),9.87%(8例)和9.21%(7例),经比较其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:从药物经济学角度分析的5种抗菌药物中,A组(左氧氟沙星)对治疗泌尿系统感染的疗效为最优治疗方案。 Objective: To analyse the cost-effectiveness for 5 kinds of antibacterial agents in patients with urinary tract infections and to promote clinical rational drug use and reduce the cost of treatment. Methods: Collecting 391 cases of patients with urinary system infection treated in Ganzhou Municipal Hospital between December 2009 and February 2014, and dividing into five groups A, B, C, D and E of according to the different drugs treatment. 83 patients of A group were given levofloxacin for treatment, 77 patients of B group were given gatifloxacin for treatment, 74 patients of C group wcre given enoxacin for treatment, 81 patients of D group were given fleroxacin for treatment and 76 patients of E group were given ciprofloxacin for treatment. Five antibacterial agents for treatment of urinary system infection of cost-effectiveness were evaluated by pharmaco-economics analysis method. Results: The effective rates of E five groups A, B, C and D of therapeutic schedule were 91.57%, 84.42%, 78.38%, 93.83% and 61.84%, respectively. And the clcarance rates of pathogens were 88.34%, 81.02%, 76.27%, 90.87% and 59.61%, respectively. The cost-effectivencss ratios (△ C/△ E) of five groups were 2.76, 3.51, 2.49, 5.06 and 1.21, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios (△ C/△ E) of five groups respectively were 4.36, 7.75, 5.62, 12.89 and 7.21. The adverse reactions rates of five groups were 9.64%(8 cases), 9.09%(7 cases), 9.46%(7 cases), 9.87%(8 cases) and 9.21%(7 cases), respectively. By compari- son, thc difference not no statistically significant(P〉0.05). Conclusion: A along 5 kinds of antibacterial agents with phannacoeconomics, levofloxacin is the optimal schedule for treatment of urinary system infection.
出处 《抗感染药学》 2014年第3期231-233,243,共4页 Anti-infection Pharmacy
关键词 抗菌药物 泌尿系统感染 成本-效果分析 antibacterial agents urinary system infection cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献83

共引文献371

同被引文献120

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部