期刊文献+

LifePort保存心脏死亡器官捐献供肾的临床研究 被引量:13

Clinical research of transporting kidney from donation after cardiac death by LifePort
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨采用LifePort保存心脏死亡器官捐献(DCD)供肾对移植肾功能恢复的影响。方法:分析解放军三〇三医院2012年8月~2013年10月期间30个DCD案例肾移植后受者的临床资料。根据同一供体两只供肾采用不同的保存方式,随机分入LifePort组(n=30)和普通冷藏组(n=30例),比较两组受者肾功能恢复延迟(DGF)、急性排斥反应(AR)等并发症的发生率及移植肾功能恢复等情况。结果:LifePort组受者的DGF发生率为20%(6/30),而普通冷藏组的DGF发生率为46.7%(14/30),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组间AR发生率、围手术期移植肾存活率及受者存活率的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。LifePort组受者术后出院时血清肌酐恢复优于普通冷藏组,且平均住院时间较短,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:LifePort能有效改善离体DCD供肾的保存质量,降低受者DGF发生率,有利于移植肾功能恢复。 Objective:To explore the effects of renal function recovery followed by kidney transplantation pumped by LifePort Kidney Transporter from donation after cardiac death(DCD).Method:From August 2012 to October 2013,the clinical data of 30 cases of renal transplantation from DCD were retrospectively analyzed in the303 rd Hospital of PLA.Two donated kidneys from one donor were randomly divided into groups given LifePort(n=30)and not given LifePort(n=30).The incidence of postoperative renal delayed graft function(DGF)and acute rejection(AR)between two groups were compared.Result:The incidence of DGF was 20%(6/30)in the recipients given LifePort,and 46.7%(14/30)in those not given LifePort.The statistical difference is significant(P 〈0.05).While there is no statistical difference between two groups in AR and other complications(P 〉0.05).The recovery of serum creatinine in recipients given LifePort was better than those not given LifePort with shorter average hospitalization time,and the statistical difference is significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion:LifePort can effectively improve the preservation of kidney from DCD and can reduce the incidence of DGF in recipients,which will benefit to graft function recovery.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2014年第8期697-700,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
基金 广西自然科学基金项目(编号2013GXNSFAA-019253) 广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(主席基金10169-05)
关键词 肾移植 心脏死亡器官捐献 机械灌注 移植肾功能延迟恢复 kidney transplantation donation after cardiac death machine perfusion delayed graft function
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Snoeijs M G,Schaubel D E,HenéR,et al.Kidneys from donors after cardiac death provide survival benefit[J].J Am Soc Nephrol,2010,21(6):1015-1021.
  • 2Farney A C,Singh R P,Hines M H,et al.Experience in renal andextrarenal transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors withselective use of extracorporeal support[J].J Am Coll Surg,2008,206(5):1028-1037.
  • 3PINE J K,Goldsmith P J,Ridgway D M,et al.Comparable outcomes in donation after cardiac death and donation after brainstem death:a matched analysis of renal transplants[J].Transplant Proc,2011,25(2):255-264.
  • 4Monbaliu D,Pirenne J,Talbot D.Liver transplantation using donation after cardiac death donors[J].J Hepatol,2012,56(2):474-485.
  • 5Barlow A D,Metcalfe M S,Johari Y,et al.Casematched comparisonof long-term results of non-heart beating and heart-beating donorrenal transplants[J].Br J Surg,2009,96(6):685-691.
  • 6Halloran P F,Hunsicker L G.Delayed graft function:state of the art,November 10-11,2000.Summit meeting,Scottsdale,Arizona,USA[J].Am J Transplant,2001,1(2):115-120.
  • 7Cantafio A W,Dick A A,Halldorson J B,et al.Risk stratification of kidneys from donation after cardiac death donors and the utility of machine perfusion[J].Clin Transplant,2011,25(5):E530-E540.
  • 8Jochmans I,Moers C,Smits J M,et al.Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death:a multicenter,randomized,controlled trial[J].Ann Surg,2010,252(5):756-764.
  • 9Sellers M T,Gallichio M H,Hudson S L,et al.Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation[J].Clin Transplant,2000,14(6):543-549.
  • 10Shah A P,Milgrom D P,Mangus R S,et al.Comparison of pulsatileperfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts[J].Transplantation,2008,86(7):1006-1009.

同被引文献93

  • 1人体器官移植条例[J].中华人民共和国卫生部公报,2007(5):1-4. 被引量:8
  • 2袁小鹏,周健,陈传宝,韩明,王小平,焦兴元,何晓顺.机器灌注保存在评价无心跳供体供肾质量中的作用[J].实用器官移植电子杂志,2013,1(4):221-225. 被引量:9
  • 3孙煦勇,赵月涛,文海涛,赖彦华,谭刘欣,董建辉,叶常青,武贵林,赵东海,李壮江.腹部多器官联合切取的临床研究(附72例报告)[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(5):316-318. 被引量:16
  • 4Kootstra G, van Heurn E. Non-heartbeating donation of kidneys for transplantation[J]. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol, 2007, 3(3) : 154-163.
  • 5Moers C, S/nits JM, MaathuisMH, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360 ( 1 ): 7-19. doi: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0802289.
  • 6Watson CJ, Wells AC, Roberts RJ, et al. Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a UK multicenter randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Transplant, 2010, 10(9):1991-1999. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-6143. 2010. 03165. x.
  • 7Farney AC, Singh RP, Hines MH, et al. Experience in renal and extrarenal transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors with selective use of extracorporeal support[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2008, 206(5): 1028-1037; discussion 1037. doi: 10. 1016/j. jamcollsurg. 2007. 12. 029.
  • 8van der Vliet JA, Kievit JK, H6n RJ, et al. Preservation of non-heart-beating donor kidneys: a clinical prospective randomised case-control study of machine perfusion versus cold storage[J]. Transplant Proc, 2001, 33(1-2):847.
  • 9Locke JE, Segev DL, Warren DS, et al. Outcomes of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: implications for allocation andpreservation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2007, 7(7) : 1797-1807.
  • 10Moustafellos P, Hadjianastassiou V, Roy D, et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation in kidney transplantation from non-heart-beating donors[-J]. Transplant Proc, 2007, 39 (5) : 1323-1325.

引证文献13

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部