期刊文献+

高龄患者半髋关节置换后骨折风险的评估方法 被引量:13

Evaluation for fracture risk in elderly patients after hemiarthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:对高龄患者(75岁以上)半髋关节置换后假体周围骨折风险的评估应当从患者术后身体健康情况、生活质量、髋关节功能、骨密度等多种综合性指标来进行动态观察才更准确,而现阶段缺乏相对全面的研究。目的:为临床诊治及预测高龄患者半髋关节置换后假体周围骨折发生风险提供参考。方法:在整理近年来部分国内外学者对髋关节假体周围骨折发生风险因素探究结果的基础上,分析了学者们对相关骨折风险因素的监测方法,同时结合现代检验科学的发展,投入临床加以尝试,总结出更为全面且有一定临床意义的高龄患者半髋关节置换后假体骨折风险因素的评估方法。结果与结论:对于高龄伴有多种内科疾病的股骨颈或转子间骨折患者,半髋关节置换是目前认为最有效的手术方式。高龄患者术后假体周围骨折发生逐渐增多,一旦出现将会给患者精神、经济甚至生命带来极大的打击。因此,早期做出对假体周围骨折风险因素有效的评估,从而选择全面正确的预防策略及治疗方式是预防和挽救这一灾难性后果的必要措施,将会极大改善患者的预后,提高患者的生活质量及存活率。通过当前短期小样本的前瞻性随访研究表明,综合性的动态评估对于高龄老年患者半髋关节置换后骨折风险的评估可能存在一定临床意义,并值得继续探索。 BACKGROUND:For evaluation of risks of periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients aged〉75 years old after hemiarthroplasty, we should perform dynamic observation of postoperative physical health status, quality of life, hip function and bone mineral density. Presently, there is lack of general investigation. OBJECTIVE:To provide references for clinical diagnosis and prediction of periprosthetic fractures after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients. METHODS:On the basis of arranging the exploration results of recent studies on risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of hip joint, we analyzed the monitoring method of scholars concerning fracture-associated risk factors. Simultaneously, in combination of the development of modern inspection sciences, the method was applied in the clinic. Thus, we summarized general evaluation methods with clinical significance for risk factors of prosthesis fracture in elderly patients after hemiarthroplasty. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:For elderly patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture combined with various medical il ness, hemiarthroplasty is an effective manner presently. Fractures surrounding the prosthesis in elderly patients postoperatively gradual y increased. Once fracture appeared, it would bring a great attack on patients’ spirit, economy and even life. Therefore, early evaluation on the risk factors for fractures surrounding the prosthesis is a necessary measure for preventing and saving this disastrous consequence by selecting general correct prevention and treatment strategies. This wil greatly improve patients’ prognosis and elevated patient’s quality of life and survival rate. Present short-term smal-sample prospective fol ow-up studies suggested that comprehensive dynamic evaluation possibly has a certain clinical significance for the evaluation of risks of fractures after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients, and deserves further investigations.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2014年第31期5062-5067,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 植入物 人工假体 高龄 髋关节置换 假体周围骨折 风险 评估 arthroplasty,replacement,hip internal fixators periprosthetic fractures risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Kynaston-Pearson F, Ashmore AM, Malak TT, et al. Primary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature. BMJ. 2013;347:f6956.
  • 2范卫民,王青,陶松年,王道新,吕征.人工关节松动病因的研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(9):518-521. 被引量:31
  • 3刘志宏,王毅,杨庆铭,冯建民,王蕾.人工髋关节置换术失败原因分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2000,20(12):723-727. 被引量:52
  • 4Burghardt A J, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, et al. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecutar bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes meltitus, J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95: 5045-5055.
  • 5Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen SW, et al. Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1 ): 126-131 .e1 -2.
  • 6Napoli N, Schwartz AV, Palermo L, et al. Risk factors for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2): 659-667.
  • 7Rizzoli R, Akesson K, Bouxsein M, et al. Subtrochanteric fractures after long-term treatment with bisphosphonates: a European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, and International Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group Report. Osteoporos Int. 2011:22:373-390.
  • 8林剑浩,吕厚山,寇伯龙,袁燕林,冯传汉.股骨头假体置换术后假体周围骨量变化的观察[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(8):494-496. 被引量:21
  • 9Melton 3rd L J, Riggs BL, Leibson CL, et al. A bone structural basis for fracture dsk in diabetes. J Clin Endocdnol Metab. 2008;93:4804-4809.
  • 10Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the rote of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:53.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop, 1995,311:46~53
  • 2[2]Steven S, John P, Pamela Smith R.N, et al. Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995,77(2): 231~239
  • 3[3]Koeger H,Miettinen H, Arnala I, Koski E, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual energy x-ray absorptionmetry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res, 1996,11(10):1526~1530
  • 4[4]Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1995,77(4):479~483
  • 5[5]Callaghan JJ, Dysart HD, Savory CF,et al. Assessing the results of hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990, 72(10):1008~1009
  • 6[6]Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, et al. Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop,1996,324:269~274
  • 7[7]Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. Modes of failure of femoral stem-type components. Clin Othop, 1979,141:17~27
  • 8[8]De Lee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Othop, 1976,121:20~32
  • 9[9]Korovessis P, Piperos G, Michael A. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after Mueller and Zweymueller total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop & Res, 1994,309 214~221
  • 10戴--戎,中华骨科杂志,1997年,17卷,3页

共引文献105

同被引文献131

引证文献13

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部