期刊文献+

临床应用新型酵母菌鉴定板的评估分析 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 酵母菌种类繁多,对其准确、快速地鉴定是临床微生物实验室协助临床正确治疗病患的前提.有较多的方法和技术被用于酵母菌的鉴定,包括形态学、生理、生化特征,以及采用酶学、血清学、蛋白质和核酸分析技术等鉴定方法[1-3].目前,酵母菌自动鉴定系统利用一系列常规的显色反应和荧光生化测试对微生物进行鉴定,广泛应用于快速鉴定从临床标本分离的酵母菌.其应用不仅避免了繁琐的手工操作,而且检测时间缩短、准确性高,能够为临床合理使用抗真菌药物提供依据[4].
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期631-633,共3页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项资助课题(2011-4001-09)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Neppelenbroek K, Seo R, Urban V, et al. Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques [ J ]. Oral Dis, 20 : 329-344.
  • 2Ellepola AN, Morrison CJ. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis[ J]. J Microbiol,2005, 43:65-84.
  • 3李安生.临床酵母菌生化鉴定方法的进展[J].国外医学(皮肤性病学分册),1994,20(5):278-281. 被引量:1
  • 4王瑶,徐英春,谢秀丽,张小江,陈民钧.全自动微生物鉴定药敏分析仪对临床相关细菌药敏测定能力的评估[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(9):1052-1055. 被引量:22
  • 5匡治州,许杨.核糖体rDNAITS序列在真菌学研究中的应用[J].生命的化学,2004,24(2):120-122. 被引量:66
  • 6唐玲,刘平,黄瑛,杨江科,闫云君.酵母的分子生物学鉴定[J].生物技术通报,2008,24(5):84-87. 被引量:19
  • 7Wang H, Xiao M, Chen SC, et al. In vitro susceptibilities of yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by the 2010 National China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) study[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50:3952-3959.
  • 8Bernal S, Martin Mazuelos E, Ch6vez M, et al. Evaluation of the new API Candida system for identification of the most clinically important yeast species [ J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1998, 32:217-221.
  • 9Hata D J, Hall L, Fothergill AW, et al. Muhicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card [J]. J Clin Micmbiol, 2007, 45:1087-1092.

二级参考文献33

  • 1付晓燕,胡克兴,范黎.脉冲场凝胶电泳技术及其在真菌学研究中的应用[J].微生物学通报,2006,33(1):144-148. 被引量:11
  • 2Garcia-Ga.rrote F, Cercenado E, Bouza E. Evaluation of a new system, VITEK 2, for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol, 2000, 35: 2105-2111.
  • 3Joyanes P, del Carmen Conejo M, Martinez-Martinez L, et al. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for the identification and susceptibility testing of three species of nonfermenting gramnegative rods frequently isolated from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol, 2001, 39: 3247-3253.
  • 4Ling TK, Tam PC, Liu ZK, et al. Evaluation of VITEK 2 rapid identification and susceptibility testing system against gramnegative clinical isolates. J Clin Mirobiol, 2001,39: 2964-2966.
  • 5Ligozzi M, Bemini C, Bonora MG, et al. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of medically relevant gram-positive cocci. J Clin Microbiol, 2002, 40: 1681-1686.
  • 6Jorgensen JH, Barry AL, Traczewski MM, et al. Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of the bioMerieux VITEK 2. J Clin Microbiol, 2000, 38: 2814-2818.
  • 7Peterson SW, Kurtzman CP. Syst Appl Microbiol, 1991,14:124-129.
  • 8Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 1998,73: 331-371.
  • 9Jack WF, Teun B, et al.Int J Syst Evol Micro Biol, 2000,50:1351- 1371.
  • 10Rosa LF, Fern6ndez-Espinar MT, et al. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2004,85:175-185.

共引文献104

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部