期刊文献+

MODS评分与应激性溃疡的相关性研究 被引量:7

Study of the correlation between MODS score and incidence of stress ulcer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 预测多器官功能障碍综合征(multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,MODS)患者应激性溃疡的发生,为其预防治疗提供依据.方法 回顾性分析2008年8月至2012年8月入住南京军区南京总医院急诊重症监护病房(emergency intensive care unit,EICU)的符合MODS诊断标准的262例患者的临床资料.根据Marshall的MODS评分标准进行评分,依据应激性溃疡诊断标准判断应激性溃疡的发生,用秩相关分析MODS评分与应激性溃疡发生的相关性,应用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)评价MODS评分对应激性溃疡的预测作用,计算Youden指数确定最佳临界值.结果 Spearman相关系数为0.693 (P <0.01),ROC下面积为0.793 (P <0.01),预测应激性溃疡的MODS评分最佳临界值为9分.结论 MODS评分能在一定程度上预测应激性溃疡的发生,MODS评分>9分时应进行应激性溃疡的预防治疗. Objective To investigate the incidence of stress ulcer in MODS patients in order to find a rationale for prophylaxis.Methods Clinical data of two hundred and sixty-two patients met the MODS diagnosis criterionadmitted to our EICU from August 2008 to August 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.The MODS score criterion proposed by Marshall was used to estimate all MODS patients.The stress ulcer was identified according to the diagnosis criterion of stress ulcer.Correlation between the score and incidence of stress ulcer was studied by rank test.The validity of MODS score to predict the incidence of stress ulcer was to verify with ROC.Optimization of critical value was obtained by Youden's index.Results Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.693 (P < 0.01).The area under the ROC was 0.793 (P < 0.01).The optimized critical value to predict the incidence of stress ulcer was 9.Conclusions The incidences of stress ulcer can be predicted to a certain extent by MODS score.Stress ulcer prophylaxis is necessary when the MODS score is above 9.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期847-851,共5页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 中国人民解放军南京军区重点课题(12Z32)
关键词 应激性溃疡 多器官功能障碍综合征 病情严重度 评分 相关性 预防 重症监护病房 回顾性研究 发生率 Stress ulcer Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome Severity Score Correlation Prophylaxis Intensive care unit Retrospective study Incidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Fennerty MB. Pathophysiology of the upper gastrointestinal tract in the critically ill patient : rationale for the therapeutic benefits of acid suppression [J]. Crit Care Med, 2002, 30 (6) :S351-S355.
  • 2Choung RS, Talley NJ. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of stress-related peptic damage and chronic peptic ulcer [ J ]. Curr Mol Med, 2008, 8 (4) : 253-257.
  • 3Shuman RB, Schuster DP, Zuckerman GR. Prophylactic therapy for stress ulcer bleeding: a reappraisal [ J ]. Ann lntem Med, 1987, 106 (4) : 562-567.
  • 4Duerksen DR. Stress-related mucosal disease in critically ill patients [J]. Best Pract & Res Clin Gast, 2003, 17 (3) : 327- 344.
  • 5Mutlu GkM, Mutlu EA, Factor P. GI complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation [ J ]. Chest, 2001, 119 ( 4 ) : 1222-1241.
  • 6Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330 (6) : 377-381.
  • 7Marshall JC, Cook D J, Christou NV, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome [J]. Crit Care Med, 1995, 23 (10) : 1638-1652.
  • 8Cook D J, Griffith LE, Walter SD, et al. The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients [ J ]. Crit Care,2001, 5 (6): 368-375.
  • 9Skillman J, Silen W. Acute gastroduodenal" stress" ulceration: barrier disruption of varied pathogenesis [ J]. Gastro, 1970, 59 (3) : 478-482.
  • 10Ali T, Harty RF. Stress-induced ulcer bleeding in critically ill patients [J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2009, 38 (2) : 245- 265.

二级参考文献49

共引文献81

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献307

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部