期刊文献+

开放手术与腔内治疗对股腘动脉闭塞的疗效评价 被引量:2

Evaluation of Open Surgery versus Endovascular Interventional Therapy in Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨TASC II C、D型股腘动脉闭塞的治疗效果。方法:将TASC II C、D型股腘动脉闭塞性病变178例患者回顾性分为观察组82例(开放手术组)和对照组96例(腔内治疗组),对其疗效和并发症进行评估。结果:术后1周、3个月,观察组通畅率及踝肱指数(ABI)略高于对照组(P>0.05);术后6、12、24个月,观察组通畅率及ABI明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组心脑血管不良事发生率高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:TASC II C、D型股腘动脉慢性闭塞性病变,开放手术治疗后ABI改善情况及中远期通畅率高于腔内治疗组。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic method for patients with TASC II C, D femoropopliteal arterial occlusive lesions.MethodsFrom March 2009 to March 2013, a total of 178 patients with TASC II C,D femoropopliteal arterial occlusive lesions, were divided into observe group and control group. Open surgery was performed in observe group(82 patients),endovascular interventional therapy was performed in control group (96 patients), The 2 groups were compared with respect to the incidence of complications and therapeutic effect.Results Clinical follow-up took place at 1 week, 3months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post procedure. At 1week and 3 months, patency rate and(ankle brachial index ABI) in observe group were higher than those in control group, but with no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05), while patency rate and ABI in control group reached statistical significance difference after 6 months(P〈0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of complications except for main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.Conclusion For patients with TASC II C, D femoropopliteal arterial occlusive lesions, open surgery can obviously increase the intermediate and long-term patency rate and ABI than endovascular interventional therapy.
出处 《中国中西医结合外科杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期367-370,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 股腘动脉闭塞 TASC C、D 外科治疗 Femoropopliteal artery occlusion TASC Ⅱ C D surgical treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterialdisease (PAD). (TASC) [J]. Vase Surg,2000,31(lpt 2):S 1-296.
  • 2Norgren L,Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Trans-Atlantic Inter-So-ciety Consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease(TASC II) [J]. J Vase Surg,2007,45(8):5-67.
  • 3Murabito JM,Evans JC,Nieto K,et al.Prevalence and clinical corre-lates of peripheral arterial disease in the Framingham OffspringStudy [J]. Am Heart J,2002,143(6):961-965.
  • 4Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheralarterial disease in the United States: results from the NationalHealth and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000 [J]. Circula-tion, 2004, 110(6): 738-743.
  • 5Krankenberg H,Schluter M,Steinkamp HJ. Nitinol stent implanta-tion versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficialfemoral artery, lesions up to 10 cm in length:the femoral arterystenting trial. (FAST) [J]. Circulation,2007,116(3):285-292.
  • 6张国栋,洪星禹,闫光军,韩涛,聂海英,孙大军.TASCⅡ A、B型股腘动脉闭塞的外科治疗[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(5):1174-1175. 被引量:1
  • 7Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Park DW, et al. Mechanisms of In - Stent Re-stenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Intravascular Ultra-sound Analysis [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,4(1):9-14.
  • 8Aihara H, Soga Y, Mii S, et al .Comparison of Long-Term Out-come After Endovascular Therapy Versus Bypass Surgery in Clau-dication Patients With Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus-IIC and D Femoropopliteal Disease [J]. Circ J,2014,78(2):457-464.
  • 9刘昌伟.股腘动脉硬化闭塞症治疗方法的合理选择及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2008,28(10):842-844. 被引量:9

二级参考文献7

  • 1Klein WM,Van der Graaf Y,Seegers J.Dutch iliac stentrtial:longterm re-sults in patients randomized for primary or selective stent placement radi-ology〔J〕.Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc,2006;238:734-44.
  • 2Krankenberg H,Schluter M,Steinkamp HJ.Nitinol stent implantation ver-sus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery le-sions up to 10 cm in length:the femoral artery stenting trial(FAST)〔J〕.Circulation,2007;116(3):285-92.
  • 3Elie Semaan,Naomi Hamburg,Wael Nasr,et al.Endovascular manage-ment of the popliteal artery:Comparison of atherectomy and angioplasty〔J〕.Vasc Endovasc Surg,2009;44(1):25-31.
  • 4Schlager O,Dick P,Sabet S,et al.Long-segment SFA stenting-the darkdides:instent restenosis,clinical deterioration,and stent fractures〔J〕.JEndovasc Ther,2005;12(6):676-84.
  • 5Surowiec SM,Davies MG,Eberly SW.Percutaneous angioplasty and stent-ing of the superficial femoral artery〔J〕.J Endovasc Ther,2005;41(2):269-78.
  • 6祝慧鹏,周艺琳,冯翔,李鸣,包俊敏,景在平.介入治疗股浅动脉硬化闭塞19例分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2009,24(10):838-841. 被引量:1
  • 7胡晓磊,舒畅,贺达仁.血管外科治疗进展与科技发展的关系[J].医学与哲学(B),2010,31(3):56-57. 被引量:7

共引文献8

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部