期刊文献+

奥沙利铂联合S-1胶囊方案和FOLFOX6方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察 被引量:4

Curative effect of oxaliplatin combined with S 1 capsule scheme and FOLFOX6 scheme on treatment of advanced gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察奥沙利铂联合S-1胶囊(替吉奥胶囊)方案和FOLFOX6方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效、毒副反应及生存期。方法将2009年1月~2012年6月在我院肿瘤内科治疗的118例晚期胃癌患者作为研究对象,随机分为治疗组(奥沙利铂联合S-1胶囊方案)60例和对照组(FOLFOX6方案)58例。两组患者化疗均不少于三周期后才进行近期疗效、毒副反应及生存期等比较。结果治疗组60例,总有效率为55.0%,对照组总有效率为32.8%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<O.05);但两组患者初治有效率(42.3%VS66.7%)与复治有效率(25.0%VS45.5%)比较,差异无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。两种方案毒副反应均较轻,以骨髓抑制及消化系统反应为主,对照组恶心呕吐发生率明显高于治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论奥沙利铂联合S-1胶囊方案与FOLFOX6方案在晚期胃癌治疗上都有一定疗效,且化疗的毒副反应能被患者耐受。但奥沙利铂联合S-1胶囊方案的临床疗效更高.消化道毒副反应轻微,更容易被患者接受,值得临床广泛运用。 Objective To observe the curative effectof oxaliplatin combined with S 1 capsule scheme and FOLFOX6 scheme on treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods 118 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly di- vided into treatment group (oxaliplatin and S 1 capsule scheme, 60 cases) and the control group (FOLFOX6 scheme, 58 cases). The recent curative effect, adverse reaction and survival were observed, Results The total effective rate of treatment group and control group were 55.0% and 32.8%(P〈0. 05). There no statistically significant difference of initial treatment efficiency and retreatment efficiency between the two groups. The adverse reaction was light includeing bone marrow suppression and digestive system reactions. Conclusion Oxaliplatin combined with S 1 capsule scheme and FOL- FOX6 scheme in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has eertain curative effect, and the side reaction of chemotherapy can be tolerance.
出处 《西部医学》 2014年第9期1158-1160,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 替吉奥胶囊 晚期胃癌 FOLFOX6方案 毒副反应 Tegafur gimeracil Oteracil potassium capsules Advanced gastric cancer FOLFOX6 Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, etal. Cancer statistics, 2011 [J]. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2011, 61(4) : 212-236.
  • 2冯志平,沈丽达,李云霞,邓明佳,谢琳.替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(7):41-43. 被引量:9
  • 3张天泽.中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范(第九分册)[M].第2版.北京:北京医科大学·中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992:12.
  • 4Ajani J A, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, etal. Muhicenter phase Ⅲ comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracit in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study the FLAGS trial [J]. Journal of clinical oncology, 2010, 28(9) : 1547-1553.
  • 5Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, etal. Capecitabine and oxali- platin for advanced esophagogastric cancer [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2008, 358(1) : 36-46.
  • 6Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study [J]. The lancet oncol- ogy, 2009, 10(11) : 1063-1069.
  • 7于洪波,冼海兵,邓燕明,李璐琳.FOLFOX6方案和TLF方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(10):2373-2376. 被引量:6

二级参考文献14

  • 1Kelley J R, Duggan J M. Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003, 56(1): 1.
  • 2Glimelius B, Ekstrm K, Hoffman K, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer[J]. AnnOncol, 1997, 8(2): 163.
  • 3Pyrhnen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxo-rubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer[J ]. Br J Cancer, 1995, 71(3): 587.
  • 4Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, et al. Randomized phase llI study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluoroumeil and folinic acid to eisplatin combined with 5- fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008, 19(8): 1450.
  • 5Ajani J A, Moiseyenko V M, Tjulandin S, et al. Clinical benefit with docetaxel plus fluorouracil and cisplatin com- pared with cisplatin and fluorouracil in a phase 11I trial of ad- vanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: the V- 325 Study Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(22) : 3205.
  • 6Ajani J A, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, et al. Multicenter phase l]I comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluo- rouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesopbneal adenocarcino- ma study: the FLAGS trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9) : 1547.
  • 7Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer[J ]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(1): 36.
  • 8Al-Batran S E, Hartmann J T, Probst S, et al. Phase HI tri- al in metastatic gastroesophageal adenoearcinoma with fluo- rouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or eisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinsehaft Internistisehe Onkologie [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(9): 1435.
  • 9N. Boku, S. Yamamoto, K. Shirao, et al. Randomized phase 1]/ study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone versus combi- nation of irinotecan and cisplatin (CP) versus S- 1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9912) [J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(18S) : LBA4513.
  • 10Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus eisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase HI trial[J]. Lancet Oneol, 2008. 9(3): 215.

共引文献14

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部