期刊文献+

玉米自交系吐丝期叶片光合参数与其耐旱性的关系 被引量:11

Relationship between Leaf Photosynthetic Parameters and Drought Resistance at Silking Stage in Maize Inbred Lines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从玉米自交系吐丝期光合特性适应干旱环境的角度,探索玉米自交系的耐旱性。2012年在土默川平原灌区和河套平原灌区以及2013年河套平原灌区,利用耐旱性不同的51个玉米自交系,在吐丝期采取干旱胁迫处理,研究分析了叶片光合相关参数对干旱胁迫的响应及其与耐旱性的关系。结果表明,玉米自交系在吐丝期干旱胁迫与正常灌溉条件下Pn、Tr、Gs、Ci、Fv/Fm、ΦPSII和SPAD的相对值与其耐旱系数呈极显著正相关,WUE相对值与耐旱系数呈极显著负相关,而qN和qP的相对值与耐旱系数不相关;上述8个叶片光合参数与耐旱系数的逐步回归分析表明,Pn、WUE、Fv/Fm、ΦPSII和SPAD相对值与耐旱系数在0.01水平显著相关,Pn、WUE、SPAD相对值对耐旱系数有直接贡献,而Fv/Fm和ΦPSII对耐旱系数起间接作用。通过上述5个显著相关光合参数将两年三地表现一致的32份自交系的抗旱性分为3类,第I类8份(H201、H21、英64、吉842、早49、吉8415、东46和沈137)属于耐旱性强的;第II类15份属于耐旱性较强的;第III类9份属于耐旱性弱的,此结果与对应的自交系产量差异分类结果相一致。因此,玉米自交系吐丝期Pn、WUE、Fv/Fm、ΦPSII、SPAD的相对值和耐旱系数可作为其耐旱性评价指标。建立了3类耐旱性玉米自交系吐丝期Pn、WUE、Fv/Fm、ΦPSII、SPAD的相对值与耐旱系数的回归方程,并明确了其阈值范围。 To explore drought resistance of maize inbred lines, based on leaf photosynthetic parameters at silking stage, we treated 51 maize inbred lines with drought stress at silking stage in the irrigation area of Tumochuan and Hetao Plain in 2012 and 2013 to analyze response of leaf photosynthetic parameters to drought stress and the relationship between photosynthetic parameters and drought tolerance. The result indicated that at silking stage, no matter under drought and the condition of irrigation, Pn, Tr, Gs, Ci, Fv/Fm,ΦPSI , and SPAD had a significant and positive correlation with drought resistance coefficient, WUE had a significant and negative correlation with it, while qN and qP had no correlation with it. Stepwise regression analysis on the eight leaf photosyn-thetic parameters above showed that Pn, WUE, Fv/Fm,ΦPSI , and SPAD significantly correlated with drought resistance coefficient at P<0.01. Pn, WUE, and SPAD directly contributed to drought resistance coefficient, while Fv/Fm andΦPSI contributed indi-rectly. Thirty-two maize inbred lines were classified into three groups based on different drought resistance, group I with the highest drought resistance contained eight inbred lines (H201, H21, Ying 64, Ji 842, Zao 49, Ji 8415, Dong 46, and Shen 137), group II with the higher drought resistance contained fifteen lines and group III with the lowest drought resistance contained nine lines. The grouping result was consistant with that of yield classification.Therefore, at silking stage, Pn, WUE, Fv/Fm,ΦPSI , SPAD, and drought resistance coefficient can be used as drought resistance evaluation indices established for the three groups of maize inbred lines. Regression relationship was between Pn, WUE, Fv/Fm, ΦPSI , SPAD, and drought resistance coefficient at silking stage, and the threshold values were confirmed.
出处 《作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期1667-1676,共10页 Acta Agronomica Sinica
基金 内蒙古杰出青年基金项目(2011JQ02) 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-02-63) 国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B13 2012BAD04B04 2013BAD07B04 2011BAD16B14)资助
关键词 玉米自交系 吐丝期 干旱胁迫 光合指标 Maize inbred lines Silking stage Drought stress Photosynthetic parameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Campos H, Cooper M, Habben J E, Edmeades G O, Schussler J R. Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res, 2004, 90:19-34.
  • 2Welsh C E, McMillan L. Accelerating the inbreeding of multi- parental recombinant inbred lines generated by sibling matings. Genes, Genomes, Genetics (Bethesda), 2012, 2:191-198.
  • 3Henry T, Singh S E Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci, 2002, 42:64-70.
  • 4Lee M, Jung J H, Han D Y, Seo P J, Park W J, Park C M. Activation of a flavin monooxygenase gene YUCCA7 enhances drought resistance in Arabidopsis. Planta, 2012, 235:925-938.
  • 5De Diego N, Perez-Alfocea F, Cantero E, Lacuesta M, Mon- calean E Physiological response to drought in radiata pine: phy- tohormone implication at leaf level. Tree Physiol, 2012, 32: 435-449.
  • 6Medrano H, Escalona J M, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot, 2002, 89:895- 905.
  • 7Saint Pierre C, Crossa J L, Bonnett D, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Reynolds M P. Phenotyping transgenic wheat for drought resis- tance. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63:1799-1808.
  • 8Deeba F, Pandey A K, Ranjan S, Mishra A, Singh R, Sharma Y K, Shirke P A, Pandey V. Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2012, 53: 6-18.
  • 9Sjursen H, Bayley M, Holmstrup M. Enhanced drought tolerance of a soil-dwelling springtail by pre-acclimation to a mild drought stress. J Insect Phvsiol, 2001, 47:1021-1027.
  • 10Aroca R, Irigoyen J J, S/mchez-Diaz M. Drought enhances maize chilling tolerance: II. Photosynthetic traits and protective mecha- nisms against oxidative stress. Physiol Plant, 2003, 117:540-549.

二级参考文献118

共引文献2017

同被引文献209

引证文献11

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部