期刊文献+

魔鬼、精神与大象——对公共行政学理论失败的反思 被引量:10

The Devil, Spirit and Elephants—— Reflection to the Theory of Public Administration Fails
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在过去的半个世纪,那些给公共行政领域划定了边界的领军式的"理论家们",专注于攻击价值中立的逻辑实证主义的罪恶。文章对过去半个世纪公共行政学的发展进行了评论,这是一种挑起争议的评论,评论的焦点是西蒙-沃尔多争论,该争论最终导致公共行政学接受了一种"专业"身份,而不是在社会科学中寻求学科地位。对该领域的学术领袖和"看门人"近期著作所作的审视表明,这种反实证主义研究的迷狂仍在继续,而无视社会科学中的重要进展。公共行政学家要进行一场政治的与范式的变革,以满足将该领域推进到一种学科地位的需要。 For the past half-century, those defining the field of Public Administration in their role as its leading 'theorists' have been preoccupied with defending the enterprise against the evils of value-neutral logical positivism. This polemical review of that period focuses on the Simon-Waldo debate that ultimately leads the field to adopt a 'professional' identity rather than seek disciplinary status among the social sciences. A survey of recent works by the field's intellectual leaders and 'gatekeepers' demonstrates that the anti-positivist obsession continues, oblivious to significant developments in the social sciences. The paper ends with a call for Public Administrations to engage in the political and paradigmatic upheavals required to shift the field toward a disciplinary stance.
出处 《甘肃行政学院学报》 CSSCI 2014年第4期12-48,共37页 Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基金 教育部2012年度人文社科青年基金项目"西方民主行政理论的逻辑进程及其对中国的启示"(批准号12YJC810030)
关键词 逻辑实证主义 主流社会科学 专业身份 西蒙 沃尔多 Logical positivism The mainstream social science Professional identity Simon Waldo
  • 相关文献

参考文献183

  • 1Adams,Guy B."Enthralled With Modernity:The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration."PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW 52,no.4(July/August)"(1992):363-373.
  • 2Adams,Guy B.,and Danny L.Balfour.UNMASK-ING ADMINISTRATIVE EVIL Advances in public admin-istration.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,1998.
  • 3Ammerman,Albert J."Taking Stock of Quantita-tive Archaeology." ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOL-OGY 21(1992):231-255.
  • 4Anderson,Benedict R.O.G.IMAGINED COMMU-NITIES:REFLECTIONS ON THE ORIGIN AND SPREAD OF NATIONALISM.Rev.and extended ed.London;New York:Verso,1991.
  • 5Bailey,Mary Timney."Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research." PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW 52,no.1(January/February)(1992):47-54.
  • 6Ball,Terence."An Ambivalent Alliance:Political Science and American Demoeraey."In POLITICAL SCI-ENCE IN HISTORY:RESEARCH PROGRAMS AND PO-LITICAL TRADITIONS,ed.James Farr,John S.Dryzek,and Steven T.Leonard.Cambridge(UK):Cambridge University Press,1995,pp.41-65.
  • 7Barnard,Chester I.THE FUNCTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1968.
  • 8Barrow,John D.THEORIES OF EVERYTHING:THE QUEST FOR ULTIMATE EXPLANATION.New York:Fawcett Columbine,1991.
  • 9Bendor,Jonathan."Formal Models of Bureaucra-cy:A Review." In LYNN AND WILDAVSKY 1990,Chap-ter 16:pp.373-417,1990.
  • 10Best,Steven,and Douglas Kellner.POSTER-MODERN THEORY:CRITICAL INTERROGATIONS Communications and cuhure.Houndmills:Macmillan,1991.

同被引文献70

引证文献10

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部