期刊文献+

杭州市大学生抑郁障碍发生风险因素及其作用机制 被引量:6

Risk factors of depression and the mechanism among college students in Hangzhou
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解大学生抑郁风险因素及其作用机制,为开展认知治疗等心理干预提供理论依据。方法对杭州市9所高校的1 427名大学生进行问卷调查,在6个月后通过邮件方式进行PHQ-9的随访,应用Logistic回归分析预测大学生6个月后抑郁障碍的风险因素,采用结构方程模型技术构建大学生抑郁初值、认知、人格、生活事件、SF-12心理功能与抑郁的关系模型。结果初测筛查有抑郁障碍大学生占被调查人数的12.6%,6个月后有抑郁障碍大学生占被调查人数的11.33%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.16,P=0.56)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,大学生6个月后抑郁障碍的预测因素有抑郁初值、人格、认知、生活事件及心理功能(P值均<0.01)。从结构方程模型可知,人格和认知对抑郁有直接作用,抑郁初值、生活事件和心理健康通过认知对抑郁有间接作用。结论大学生抑郁障碍的产生与多种因素有关。预防大学生抑郁障碍的关键在于改变不合理的认知。 Objective To explore risk factors of depression among college students,and to provide theoretical foundation of cognitive therapy for depression. Methods A total of 1 427 college students were randomly selected from 9 colleges in Hangzhou and assessed with questionnaire. About 653 students were followed up through E-mail and assessed with PHQ-9. Logistic regression analysis and structural equation model was used to explore relationships among depression, cognition, personality, life events, and SF-12 mental functioning. Results About 12.6% and 11.3% of college students had symptoms of depression in baseline and follow-up study. Stepwise logistic regression showed that baseline depression status, personality, cognitive factors, life events as well as mental functioning could predict follow-up depression. Personality and cognition had directed effects on depression; Baseline depression, life events and mental functioning had indirect effects on depression through cognition. Conclusion Multiple factors could affect depression among university students. Depression prevention among university students should emphasis on cognitive-behavioral therapy.
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第7期1008-1010,共3页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 浙江省教育厅科研项目(Y201120904)
关键词 抑郁 回归分析 学生 Depression Regression analysis Students
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1周鄂生,Qin Ping,杨旭,曹毅,王昆,周砚青.中国大学生抑郁症和自杀行为的研究进展[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2007,18(2):37-40. 被引量:40
  • 2HANKIN BL, ABRMSON LY. Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression in adolescence : Reliability, validity, and gender differ- ences [ J ]. J Clin Child Adoles Psychol, 2002,31 (4) : 491 - 504.
  • 3LAZARUS RS, FLOKMAN. Stress, appraisal and coping[ M]. New York : Springer, 1984 : 117-126.
  • 4KING G, WILLOUGHBY C, SPECHT JA, et al. Social support processes and the adaptation of individuals with chronic disabilities [J]. Qual Health Res, 2006,16(7):902-925.
  • 5BECK AT, RUSH AJ, SHAW BF, et al. Cognitive therapy of depres- sion[M]. New York: Guilford, 1979.
  • 6JENKINSON C, LAYTE R, JENKINSON D, et al. A shorter form health survey: Can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies[J]. J Public Health Med, 1997,19 (2):179- 186.
  • 7KROENKE K, SPITZER RL, WILLIAMS JBW. The PHQ-9-Validi- ty of a brief depression severity measure [ J ]. J General Int Med, 2001,16(9) :606-613.
  • 8汪向东 王希林 马弘主编.心理卫生评定量表手册:增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.31435.
  • 9曹日芳,陈树林,唐文新,宋海东.自动思维问卷的信度和效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(2):108-109. 被引量:66
  • 10曾琳娜.体育专业大学生抑郁症状及影响因素的研究[J].中国校医,2003,17(5):393-394. 被引量:12

二级参考文献90

共引文献544

同被引文献79

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部