期刊文献+

^99^Tc^m-硫胶体不同制备条件及注射部位对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检出的影响 被引量:7

Effects of different preparation methods and injection sites of 99Tcm-sulfur colloid on sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察99^Tc^m-SC不同配置条件及注射部位对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)检出的影响,探讨进行乳腺癌SLN活检术(SLNB)的最佳方法.方法 制备99^Tc^m-SC时将煮沸时间分别控制在3 min(显像剂1)和5 min(显像剂2),分别测定显像剂1和显像剂2放置10 min、1h、2h和4h的放化纯及胶体大小分布.将147例乳腺癌患者用抽签法分成3组:A组40例,于乳晕周围乳腺组织内注射显像剂1;B组40例,于乳晕周围乳腺组织内注射显像剂2;C组67例,于肿块周围乳腺组织内注射显像剂2.所有患者均于术前0.5~1 h行SPECT/CT显像,并在肿块上方皮下注射蓝染料.比较3组患者腋窝及内乳SLN显像成功率及术中检出率.分别采用两独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析和r检验对相关数据进行统计学分析.结果 显像剂1和显像剂2的放化纯在放置10 min、1h、2h及4h时差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.267、-0.794、0.826和-0.977,均P>0.05);显像剂2与显像剂1相比,粒径<100nm的粒子所占百分比明显减少[(65.25±3.56)%与(73.72±2.36)%;t=6.436,P<0.05],平均有效粒径明显增大[(75.59±7.04) nm与(45.27±6.42) nm;t=7.315,P<0.05).3组患者内乳SLN的检出率分别为70.0% (28/40)、47.5% (19/40)和17.9% (12/67),差异有统计学意义(x2=29.525,P<0.05);3组患者腋窝SLN的检出率分别为100% (40/40)、95.0%(38/40)及97.0%(65/67),差异无统计学意义(r=2.686,P>0.05).结论 通过缩短煮沸时间减小99^Tc^m-SC胶体粒径,经肿瘤上方皮下注射蓝染料、乳晕周围乳腺组织内注射核素及SPECT/CT断层显像,可获得较好的乳腺癌腋窝和内乳SLN检出效果. Objective To prospectively investigate the optimal setting for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer by comparing the effects of different preparation methods and injection sites of 99^Tc^m-SC in sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and detection.Methods Two batches of 99^Tc^m-SC were prepared by boiling for 3 min (radiotracer 1) and 5 min (radiotracer 2),respectively.Radioactive chemical purity (RCP) and size of colloid particles were measured at 10 min,1 h,2 h and 4 h after the preparation.One hundred and forty-seven patients with breast cancer were involved and randomly divided into 3 groups.Group A consisted of 40 patients with periareolar injection of radiotracer 1,group B of 40 patients with periareolar injection of radiotracer 2,and group C of 67 patients with peritumoral injection of radiotracer 2.Lymphatic mapping was performed for all patients using SPECT/CT preoperatively and blue dye was subdermally injected over the tumor.The detection rate of the axillary and internal mammary SLN was recorded.One-way analysis of variance,independent two-sample t and x2 tests were used to analyze the data.Results There was no significant difference of RCP between the two radiotracers at 10 min,1 h,2 h and 4 h after preparation (t =-0.267,-0.794,0.826 and-0.977,all P〉0.05).Compared with radiotracer 1,the percentage of particles smaller than 100 nm in radiotracer 2 reduced significantly ((73.72±2.36) % vs (65.25±3.56)%,t=6.436,P〈0.05) and the mean effective particle size was significantly larger ((45.27±6.42) nm vs (75.59t7.04) nm,t=7.315,P〈0.05).In groups A,B and C,the detection rate of the internal mammary SLN was 70.0% (28/40),47.5% (19/40) and 17.9% (12/67),respectively,with significant difference (x2=29.525,P〈0.05).In groups A,B and C,the detection rate of the axillary SLN was 100% (40/40),95.0% (38/40) and 97.0% (65/67),respectively,without significant difference (x2 =2.686,P〉 0.05).Conclusion For SLNB of patients with breast cancer,the axillary and internal mammary SLN could be better detected by SPECT/CT lymphatic mapping using radiotracer prepared with a shorter boiling time,via periareolar injection,and combined with subdermal injection of blue dye.
出处 《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期296-300,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
基金 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2012HM011)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 淋巴结 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 体层摄影术 X线计算机 硫胶体 Breast neoplasms Lymph nodes Tomography, emission-computed, single-photon Tomography, X-ray computed Sulfur colloid
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Suami H,Pan WR,Mann GB,et al.The lymphatic anatomy of the breast and its implications for sentinel lymph node biopsy:a human cadaver study[ J].Ann Surg Oncol,2008,15:863-871.
  • 2Yao MS,Kurland BF,Smith AH,et al.Internal mammary nodalchain drainage is a prognostic indicator in axillary node-positive breast cancer[ J].Ann Surg Oncol,2007,14:2985-2993.
  • 3Kong AL,Tereffe W,Hunt KK,et al.Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage Ⅰ to Ⅲ breast cancer[J].Cancer,2012,118:6287-6296.
  • 4Chen RC,Lin NU,Golshan M,et al.Internal mammary nodes in breast cancer:diagnosis and implications for patient management-a systematic review[ J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26:4981-4989.
  • 5Tsopelas C.Understanding the radiolabelling mechanism of 99Tcm-antimony sulphide colloid[J].Appl Radiat Isot,2003,59:321-328.
  • 6Soran A,Falk J,Bonaventura M,et al.Does failure to visualize a sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predict a greater likelihood of axillary lymph node positivity[ J]? J Am Coll Surg,2007,205:66-71.
  • 7Kesmodel SB,Canter RJ,Terhune KP,et al.Use of radiotracer for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer optimizes staging in-dependent of site of administration[ J].Clin Nucl Med,2006,31:527-533.
  • 8Giammarile F,Alazraki N,Aarsvold JN,et al.The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer [ J ].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2013,40:1932-1947.
  • 9Cserni G,Szekeres JP.Internal mammary lymph nodes and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer[ J].Surg Oncol,2001,10:25-33.
  • 10Eshima D,Eshima LA,Gotti NM,et al.Technetium-99m-sulfur colloid for lymphoscintigraphy:effects of preparation parameters [J].J Nucl Med,1996,37:1575-1578.

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘欢,翟锦,江雷.纳米材料的自组装研究进展[J].无机化学学报,2006,22(4):585-597. 被引量:33
  • 2Solorzano CC, Ross MI, Delpassnd E, et al. Utility of breast sentinel lymph node biopsy using day-before-surgery injection of high-dose ^99Tc^m-sulfur colloid. Ann Sturg Oncol, 2001, 8: 821-827.
  • 3McCarter MD, Yeung H, Yeh S, et al. Localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer: identical results with same-day and day-before isotope injection. Ann Stag Oncol, 2001, 8 : 682-686.
  • 4Bauer TW, Spitz FR, Callans LS, et al. Subareolar and peritumoral injection identify similar sentinel nodes for breast cancer. Ann Stag Oncol,2002, 9: 169-176.
  • 5Shimazu K, Tamaki Y, Taguchi T, et al. Comparison between periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Surgery, 2002, 131: 277-286.
  • 6Cody HS Ⅲ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy. London: Martin, 2002. 39.
  • 7Glass EC, Essner R, Giuliano AE. Sentinel node localization in breast cancer. Semin in Nucl Med, 1999, 29: 57-68.
  • 8Krag D, Weaver D, Askikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer multicentre validation study. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339: 941-946.
  • 9Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes, lancet, 1997, 349: 1864-1867.
  • 10Gulec SA, Moffat FL, Carroll RG, et al. Sentinel lymph node localization in early breast cancer. J Nucl Med, 1998, 39: 1388-1393.

共引文献35

同被引文献51

  • 1National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology(Version 1. 2012 )[EB/ OL]. http: //www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf.
  • 2Wilhelm AJ, Mijnhout GS, Franssen EJ. Radiopharmaceuticals in sentinel lymph-node detection-an overview[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 1999, 26(4 Suppl): s36-42.
  • 3Michenfelder MM, Bartlett LJ, Mahoney DW, et al. Particle-size and radiochemical purity evaluations of filtered 99mTc-sulfur colloid prepared with different heating times[J]. J Nucl Med Technol, 2014, 42(4): 283-288. DOI: 10. 2967/jnmt.l14.145391.
  • 4Kameswaran M, Subramanian S, Pandey U, et al. Preliminary eval- uation of the potential of 9mTc carbonyl-DTPA-Rituximab as a trac- er for sentinel lymph node detection[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2016,107: 195-198.
  • 5Morais M, Campello MP, Xavier C, et al. Radiolabeled mannosylat- ed dextran derivatives bearing an NIR-fluorophore for sentinel lymph node imaging[J]. Bioconjug Chem, 2014, 25 (11 ): 1963- 1970. DOI: 10. 1021/bc500336a.
  • 6Surasi DS, O'Malley J, Bhambhvani P. 99mTc-Tilmanocept : A Novel Molecular Agent for Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Localization[J]. J Nucl Med Technol, 2015, 43 (2): 87-91. DOI: 10. 2967/jnmt. 115. 155960.
  • 7Van Den Berg NS, Buckle T, Kleinjan GI, et al. Hybrid tracers for sentinel node biopsy[J]. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2014, 58 (2): 193-206.
  • 8Deininger RA, Lee JY. Comment on "An ATP-based method for monitoring the microbiological drinking water quality in a distribu- tion network" by E. Delahaye et al., 2003. Water Res. 37, 3689- 3696[J]. Water Res, 2005, 39(12) : 2778-2779. DOI: 10. 1016/j. watres. 2005.04. 030.
  • 9Sappey MPC. Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathologie des vaisseaux Lymphatiques consideres chez L' homme at les Vertebres [M]. Paris : A. Delahaye and E. Lecrosnier, 1874.
  • 10Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, et al. Anatomy and physi- ology of lymphatic drainage of the breast from the perspective of sentinel node biopsy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2001, 192(3) : 399-409. DOI: 10. 1016/s1072-7515(00)00776-6.

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部