期刊文献+

维和医疗队部署前培训考核评估调查分析

Research and analysis on evaluation of training test for pre-deployment of PLA peacekeeping medical units
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查分析我军维和医疗分队部署前培训考核评估现状并提出改进建议。方法通过查阅文献、召开座谈会、现场察看、问卷调查等调查形式收集资料,以柯氏培训评估模式为指导,进行反应层、学习层、行为与结果层的满意度及实施机构的调查,并结合实际评估工作,开展对考核评估现状的解析。结果调查评估满意度总体回馈较好,存在的问题主要包括英语交流薄弱、专业基础忽视、实战共识提高以及评估量化不完善等。我军维和医疗队部署前培训考核评估没有实现标准化,培训评估效益体现不明显。结论建议构建考核评估指标体系,并使考核评估标准化。 Objective To investigate the current situation of evaluation of the training test for pre-deployment training of PLA peacekeeping medical team, and to propose improving suggestions. Methods The related data were collected by literature review, seminar (four sessions), spot investigation, and questionnaire survey in this study. Kirkpatrick Mode was used as a guide to analyze the satisfaction degree of response, learning, and behavior-and-result layers and the implementation institutions. Based on the actual evaluation work, the current situation of the training test was analyzed. Results The overall response to the satisfaction degree was good. Problems mainly included poor English communication, ignorance of the profession basics, improvement of real combat thinking and imperfect quantification of the evaluation. The evaluation of training test for pre-deployment training of PLA peacekeeping medical team has not heen standardized, which led to unclear evaluation outcome. Conclusion We suggest establishment of a standard index system for test evaluation of pre-deployment training of PLA peacekeeping medical unit.
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期828-831,共4页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基金 军队"十二五"课题(2013XL015)~~
关键词 维和医疗队 部署前培训 教育考核 现状调查 peacekeeping medical teams pre-deployment training educational measurement current situation research
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献20

  • 1王与荣,朱役.维和医疗分队(中国)卫勤保障方案的几个问题[J].医学研究生学报,2005,18(9):824-826. 被引量:43
  • 2俞成枫.对医院岗前培训中存在问题的相关思考.中外健康文摘,2009,6(29):255-256.
  • 3ASTD research report.Value of evaluation: making training evaluation more effective, http://www, astd. org/, 2011-5-25.
  • 4Jim and Wendy Kirk.patrick.Thrne Steps to Effectiveness.http://clomedia.com/ &rticles/view/three stepstoeffectiveness. 20] 1-5-22,.
  • 5TMP. Editors.Study shows poor training evaluation.http://www.tmreview. com/Editoriai.asp?lD=1800, 2011-5-24.
  • 6唐纳德 L.柯克帕特里克,詹姆斯 D.柯克帕特里克.如何做好培训评估[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.
  • 7戴绍安,李英.中国人民解放军部队维和行动后勤保障[M].北京:解放军出版社,2004.208.
  • 8ASTD research report.Value of evaluation:making trainingevaluation more effective[EB/OL].http://www.astd.org/,2011-5-23.
  • 9TMR Editors.Study shows poor training evaluation[EB/OL].http://www.tmreview.com/Editorial.asp?ID=1800,2011-5-24.
  • 10Jim and Wendy Kirkpatrick.Three Steps to Effectiveness[EB/OL].http://clomedia.com/articles/view/three_steps_to_effectiveness,2011-05-22.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部