期刊文献+

腰椎退变性滑脱临床与影像学分型的可信度与可重复性分析 被引量:6

Reliability and reproducibility analysis of clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腰椎退变性滑脱临床与影像学(CARDS)分型的可信度与可重复性,分析其临床应用价值。方法:以CARDS分型为标准,由5位研究者对2010年1月-2013年12月在我院就诊的49例退变性腰椎滑脱患者进行独立分型,1个月后再次独立分型。收集结果,分别行不同观察者间可信度和同一观察者内可重复性分析,计算Kappa值与Spearman相关系数。结果:共计490例次分型中,包括A型74例次(15%),B型167例次(34%),C型187例次(38%)和D型62例次(13%)。5位研究者在第1次测试中对椎间隙高度、后凸畸形、滑脱距离及最终分型判断一致的百分比分别为77.6%-93.9%(89.6%)、69.4%-91.8%(86.6%)、67.3%-81.6%(77.5%)和65.3%-81.6%(74.1%);可信度Kappa值分别为、0.764、0.719、0.596和0.641;Spearman相关系数分别为0.564、0.612、0.576和0.589。同一研究者前后两次测试中对椎间隙高度、后凸畸形、滑脱距离及最终分型判断一致的百分比分别为85.7%-98.0%(94.7%)、89.8%-95.9%(92.1%)、77.6%-91.8%(87.5%)和75.5%-87.8%(82.4%);其可重复性Kappa值分别为0.857、0.842、0.779和0.804;Spearman相关系数分别为0.714、0.702、0.689和0.645。结论:CARDS分型应用于退变性腰椎滑脱患者具有较高的可信度与极佳的可重复性,值得临床推广应用。 Objectives: To investigate the inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis(CARDS) classification system for degenerative spondy- lolisthesis and its clinical values. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2013, 49 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated in our department. Based on the CARDS classification system, the radiographs were assessed by five observers independently on two separate occasions with an interval of 1 month. The inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the system were quantified by using Kappa value and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The total 490 classifications were evaluated for two times. Fifteen percent(74 cases) were described as type A; thirty-four percent(167 cases), as type B; thirty-eight percent(187 cases), as type C and thirteen percent(62 cases), as type D. The inter-observer reliability assessed by the mean percentage and Kappa values at the first time was 77.6%-93.9%(89.6%), 0.764 respectively for disc space; 69.4%-91.8%(86.6%), 0.719 respectively for kyphosis; 67.3%-81.6%(77.5%), 0.596 respectively for translation; 65.3%-81.6%(74.1%), 0.641 respectively for final classification. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.564, 0.612, 0.576 and 0.589, respectively. The intra-observer reproducibility assessed by the mean percentage and Kappa values was 85.7%-98.0%(94.7%), 0.857 respectively for disc space; 89.8% -95.9%(92.1%), 0.842 respectively for kyphosis; 77.6%-91.8%(87.5%), 0.779 respectively for translation;75.5%-87.8%(82.4%), 0.804 respectively for final classification. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.714, 0.702, 0.689 and 0.645, respectively. Conclusions: The CARDS classification system for degenerative spondylolisthesis has good inter-observer reliability and excellent intra-observer reproducibility.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期729-733,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(编号:S2011040002494)
关键词 腰椎滑脱 退变性 分型 可信度 可重复性 Lumbar spondylolisthesis Degeneration Classification Reliability Reproducibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Weinstein JN,Lurie JD,Tosteson TD,et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis[J]. N Engl J Med,2007,356(22):2257-2270.
  • 2Eismont FJ,Norton RP,Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2014,22(4):203-213.
  • 3Sengupta DK,Herkowitz HN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis:review of current trends and controversies[J]. Spine,2005,30(6 Suppl):71-81.
  • 4Kepler CK,Hilibrand AS,Sayadipour A,et al. Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis(CARDS)classification[J]. Spine J,2014,pii:S1529-9430(14)00353-2. doi:10 . 1016/j. spinee. 2014. 03. 045. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 5Landis JR,Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J]. Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.
  • 6Wiltse LL,Newman PH,Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1976,(117):23-29.
  • 7Meyerding HW. Spondyloptosis[J]. Surg Gynaecol Obstet,1932,54:371-377.
  • 8Matsunaga S,Ijiri K,Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis:a 10-to 18-year follow-up study[J]. J Neurosurg,2000,93(2 Suppl):194-198.
  • 9Chang HS,Fujisawa N,Tsuchiya T,et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis[J]. Spine,2014,39(5):400-408.
  • 10Kalichman L,Hunter DJ. Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17(3):327-335.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Roussouly P,Nnadi C.Sagittal plane deformity:an overviewof interpretation and management[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(1):1824-1836.
  • 2Le H,Leijssen P,Duarte M,et al.Thoracolumbar imbalanceanalysis for osteotomy planification using a new method:FBItechnique[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(Suppl 5):669-680.
  • 3Barrey C,Roussouly P,Perrin G,et al.Sagittal balance dis-orders in severe degenerative spine:can we identify thecompensatory mechanisms[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(Suppl 5):626-633.
  • 4Dubousset J.Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic defor-mity.In:Weinstein SL,ed.Pediatric Spine:Principles andPractice[M].New York,NY:Raven Press,1994.
  • 5Cheng I.Point of view:spinopelvic parameters in postfusionflatback deformity patients[J].Spine J,2009,9(8):672-673.
  • 6Gottfried O,Daubs M,Patel A,et al.Spinopelvic parametersin postfusion flatback deformity patients[J].Spine J,2009,9(8):639-647.
  • 7Potter B,Lenke L,Kuklo T.Prevention and management of i-atrogenic flatback deformity[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86-A(8):1793-1808.
  • 8Schwab F,Lafage V,Boyce R,et al.Gravity line analysis inadult volunteers:age-related correlation with spinal parame-ters,pelvic parameters,and foot position[J].Spine,2006,31(25):E959-967.
  • 9Glassman S,Bridwell K,Dimar J,et al.The impact of posi-tive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity[J].Spine,2005,30(18):2024-2029.
  • 10Schwab F,Smith V,Biserni M,et al.Adult scoliosis:aquantitative radiographic and clinical analysis[J].Spine,2002,27(4):387-392.

共引文献20

同被引文献39

引证文献6

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部