两种吸痰方法在小儿喘憋性肺炎中的比较及护理

Two kinds of suction method in children with pneumonia in comparison and nursing

目的:探讨两种吸痰方法治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的临床治疗效果,以便寻找一种更有效的小儿吸痰方法。方法:对80例喘憋性肺炎患儿资料进行回顾性分析,将这些患儿随机分为两组,一组为试验组,另一组为对照组,每组40例。对照组采用常规吸痰法,试验组采用深部吸痰法,观察两组患儿吸痰法的总有效率,比较两种吸痰法的效果。结果:对照组吸痰有效25例,无效15例;试验组有效38例,无效2例,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:正确有效的呼吸道护理可以显著提高小儿喘憋性肺炎的治愈率和抢救成功率,而且能缩短病程,减少住院时间和住院费用,提高患儿家属满意度。

Objective To investigate the treatment of children with two kinds of suction method with pneumonia clinical effect,in order to find a more effective method of pediatric suction.Methods Treated 80 cases of children with pneumonia patients were retrospectively analyzed,these patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group for the experimental group,the other group was the control group,40 patients in each group.Control group with conventional suction method,the experimental group were deep suction method,suction method were observed in children with total effective method of comparing two suction effect.Results In the control group,suctioning effective in 25 cases,15 cases;experimental group effective 38 cases,2 cases,and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Correct and effective respiratory care can significantly improve the cure rate in children with pneumonia and success rate,and can shorten the course,reduce the length of stay and hospital costs.