期刊文献+

稳定期肾移植受者使用麦考酚钠肠溶片的剂量与其暴露水平的相关性 被引量:1

Association between enteric coated mycophenolate sodium dose and exposure level in stable renal transplantation recipients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察应用麦考酚钠肠溶片(Ec-MPs)的。肾移植术后6个月稳定期受者EC-MPS用量与麦考酚酸(MPA)暴露水平的相关性。方法纳入68例受者,所有受者均采用他克莫司(Tat)、EC-MPS和泼尼松(Pred)的三联免疫抑制方案。于服用EC-MPS后1、2、4h采集外周静脉血,通过酶增强免疫分析技术测定血浆MPA浓度,以有限采样法的简化公式计算血MPA浓度-时间曲线下面积(MPAAuc)。根据MPAAUC值,将受者分为MPA低暴露(MPAAUC〈30mg·h·L-1)组,MPA目标暴露(MPAAUC=30~60mg·h·L11)组和MPA高暴露(MPAAUC〉60mg·h-1·L-1)组。结果68例受者的MPAAUC值为(58.73±20.14)mg·h·L-1,其中MPA低暴露组5例(7.350),MPA目标暴露组35例(51.47%),MPA高暴露组28例(41.18%);3组Tac用量分别为(4.21±0.67)mg/d、(3.82±1.07)mg/d、(3.37±0.62)mg/d,呈递减趋势,MPA高暴露组Tac用量显著低于MPA低暴露组Tac用量,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论不同受者间MPA药代动力学存在较大差异,有必要对稳定期。肾移植受者EC-MPS进行监测;充足的MPA暴露有助于降低Tac的剂量,且不影响移植肾功能。 Objective To observe the association between enteric coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) dose and its exposure level at 6th month after renal transplaintation in the stable recipients. Method Sixty-eight recipients were treated with tacrolimus (Tac), EC-MPS and prednisone (Pred) triple immunosuppressive regimen. Peripheral venous blood was collected at 1st, 2 nd, and 4 th h after EC-MPS oral administration, and the area under concentration and time curve of MPA in the recipients were calculate by LSS formula. According to the MPA AUC value, the recipients were divided into low MPA exposure (MPA AUC 〈30 mg-h.L-1) group, MPA target exposure (MPA AUC= 30-60 mgohoL-1) group and MPA high exposure group (MPA AUC 〉60 mgoh.L-1) group. Result In 68 recipients MPA AUC was (58. 73 - 20. 14) mg,h L-1 , including 5 cases (7. 35%) in MPA low exposure group, 35 cases (51.47%) in MPA target exposure group, and 28 cases (41.18%) in MPA high exposure group, respectively. Tac doses in MPA low exposure group, MPA target exposure group, and MPA high exposure group were (4. 21± 0. 67), (3. 82 ± 1.07), and (3.37 ±0. 62) mg/day respectively, and showed a decreasing trend. The dosage of Tac in MPA high exposure group was significantly lower than in MPA low exposure group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion There were significant differences in MPA pharmacokinetics among individuals, so it is necessary to monitor EC-MPS pharmacokinetics for stable renal transplant recipients. Adequate exposure of MPA helps to reduce the dose of Tac, and does not influence the renal graft function.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期469-472,共4页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
基金 卫生部国际交流与合作中心合作项目(IHECC08-201215)
关键词 肾移植 麦考酚钠肠溶片 麦考酚酸 剂量效应关系 药物 Kidney transplantation Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium Mycophenolic acid Dose-response relationship, drug
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kelly P, Kahan BD. Review: metabolism of immunosuppressant drugs[J]. CurrDrugMetab, 2002, 3(3): 275-287.
  • 2Qureshi A, Scheinfeld N. Myfortic (mycophenolate sodium) delayed-release tablets[J]. Dermatol Online J, 2008, 14(8) : 4.
  • 3Kuypers DR, Meur YL, Cantarovich M, et al. Consensus report on therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolie acid in solid organ transplantation[J]. ClinJ Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 5(2):341-358.
  • 4C. Ding, W. Xue, P. Tian, et al. Which is more suitable for kidney transplantation at the early post-transplantation phase in China - low dosing or standard dosing of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium[J]. Int J Clin Pratt, 2014, 68 (181).. 10-16.
  • 5Salvadori M, Bertoni E, Budde K, et al. Superior efficacy of enteric-coated myeophenolate vs myeophenolate mofetil in de novo transplant recipients: pooled analysis [J]. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(4) .. 1325-1328.
  • 6石炳毅,凌建煜,韩文科,肖序仁,黎磊石,杜林栋,徐达,张炜,陈立中,卢一平,陈忠华,谭建明,朱有华.麦考酚钠肠溶片在肾移植术后早期治疗中的有效性和安全性[J].中华器官移植杂志,2010(4):216-219. 被引量:4
  • 7BurdmannEA, Andoh TF, Yu L, et al. Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2003, 23(5):465-476.
  • 8Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(25) : 2562-2575.
  • 9Hart M, Chan L, Andres A, et al. Renal function with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in combination with reduced and standard tacrolimus levels: results of a 6-month comparative study in de novo renal transplant recipients[J]. Am J Transplant, 2008, 8 (Suppl 2) : 583, 1526.
  • 10BuddeK, Becker T, Arns W, et al. Everolimus-based, calcineurininhibitor free regimen in recipients of de-novo kidney transplants: an open labeled, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377 (9768):837-847.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Halloran P,Mathew T,Tomlanovich S,et al.Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients:a pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized,double-blind,clinical studies in prevention of rejection.The International Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplant Study Groups.Transplantation,1997,63(1):39-47.
  • 2A blinded,randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation.Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group.Transplantation,1996,61(7):1029-1037.
  • 3Knoll GA,MacDonald I,Khan A,et al.Mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction and the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation.J Am Soc Nephrol,2003,14(9):2381-2386.
  • 4Hardinger K,Brennan DC,Lowell J,et al.Long-term outcome c.gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil Transpl Int,2004,17(10):609-616.
  • 5Budde K,Bauer S,Hambach P,et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal transplant patients.Am J Transplant,2007,7(4):888-898.
  • 6Salvadori M,Holzer H,de Mattos A,et al.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients.Am J Transplant,2004,4(2):231-236.
  • 7Salvadori M,Budde K,Holzer H,et al.EC-MPS is associated with superior efficacy outcomes compared to MMF in de novo kidney transplant patients:a pooled analysis.American Transplant Congress,2009,abstract 99.
  • 8Sollinger H,Sundburg AK,Leverson G,et al.Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium:a Large,single-center comparison of dose adjustments and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.Transplantation,2010,89(4):446-451.
  • 9Cooper M,Deering K,Slakey D,et al.Comparing outcomes associated with dose manipulations of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients.Transplantation,2(109,88 (4):514-520.
  • 10Shehata M,Bhandari S,Venkat-Rarnan G,et al.Effect of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium on maximum tolerated dose and gastrointestinal symptoms following kidney transplantation.Transplantation Int,2009,22(8):821-830.

共引文献3

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部